ArticleHeliyon2023
From FITT to FISTT: The task-skills fit before the introduction of assistive, digital health technologies.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sociotechnical Adaptation of Telerehabilitation in Rehabilitation Practice: Survey Among Rehabilitation Professionals.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To enhance the predictive power of the Fit between Individuals, Task and Technology (FITT) framework in mobile, individual consumer settings by restructuring Design: A mixed study involving a quantitative survey of 679 potential patients (adopters) and a qualitative content analysis of ten semi-structured interviews with clinic assistants. Setting: For the survey, three combined random samples of potential patients from Atteridgeville, Bapong and Garankuwa (South Africa). Ten Unjani clinic assistants were also interviewed about their tasks, skills, and related properties and attributes using a semi-structured interview guide. Participants: Participants in the survey were potential patients over 18 years of age in the three sampled locations. In the qualitative study, interviewed participants were employed as clinic assistants in ten clinics within the Unjani Clinic Network Main outcome measures: in the quantitative study, the statistical significance of the relationships between smartphone experience and health motivation on the one hand and the adopter's perceived self-efficacy on the other. In the qualitative study, the extent to which task properties, context, and the adopters' levels of education and training affect their perceived self-efficacy Findings: There is a significant relationship between smartphone experience and perceived self-efficacy and a moderately significant relationship between health motivation and perceived self-efficacy. Furthermore, task properties, task context, and an adopter's level of education and training considerably influence their perceived self-efficacy on a given future assistive digital health technology (ADHT). Conclusion: Extending the FITT to the FISTT framework to explicitly include the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.