ArticleMedical science educator2023
The Effect of Mobile Applied Anatomy Learning on Students' Academic Success, Cognitive Loads, and Attitudes.
Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of glasses-free 3D anatomy learning materials through a randomized control study with a puzzle-like method.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Trial
- Evaluating a digital serious game for learning medical terminology in a randomized controlled trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Content Analysis of Human Anatomy Mobile Apps for Undergraduate Student Learning using MARuL.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- From the dissection hall to the digital frontier: A comprehensive review of innovations in anatomical pedagogy and their impact on health literacy and promotion.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- An Alternative Approach in Anatomy Education: Design of a Learning Environment Based on Artificial Intelligence-Supported Virtual Manipulatives and Investigation of Its Effectiveness.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Negatively Marked Elimination-Format Multiple-Choice Questions Are Associated with High Cognitive Load and Poor Student Experience Compared to Single Best Answer.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Technologies for Studying and Teaching Human Anatomy: Implications in Academic Education.Medical science educator · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives: Anatomy has always been one of the most important components of Health Science education. Worldwide, anatomy education is given in an environment based on cadaver, touch and 3D designs. However, this process has become quite difficult as the pandemic restricted use of laboratory procedures, models, and other learning materials. Therefore, education with mobile applications has become much more important. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of mobile applications used in anatomy course, which is one of the courses that form the basis of medical science, on the success levels of students, and to evaluate their perspectives on this method. Methods: In this study, a real experimental research model with pretest-posttest control group was used in order to determine the difference that may occur between academic achievement and cognitive load when anatomy course students use traditional method or mobile application technology learning method. Results: The findings of the study showed that the students in the experimental group, in which mobile applications were used in the anatomy course, had higher achievement levels and lower cognitive loads than the students in the control group. Another point that was determined was that the students in the experimental group were satisfied with the fact that the use of the mobile application facilitated learning, and they learned better as the ease of use in the mobile application increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.