ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2023
Prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases.
Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twenty-Two Years of Prenatal Testing for Suspected Monogenic Disorders: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience in Western Romania.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inherited cancer predisposition and reproductive choice: enlightening research insights.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Review
- PIGO Gene Variants: New Insights Into Prenatal Diagnosis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Identification of a Homozygous Variant in theGenes · 2025Article
- Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases is a process involving the use of a variety of molecular techniques for the molecular characterization of a potential monogenic disease in the fetus during pregnancy. Prenatal genetic diagnosis can be performed through invasive and non-invasive methods. A distinction must be made between "NIPD" (non-invasive prenatal diagnosis), which is considered to be diagnostic, from "NIPT" (non-invasive prenatal test), which is a screening test that requires subsequent confirmation by invasive methods. The different techniques currently available aim at detecting either, previously characterized pathogenic mutations in the family, the risk haplotype associated with the familial mutation, or potential pathogenic mutation(s) in a gene associated with a diagnostic suspicion. An overview is provided of relevant aspects of prenatal genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases. The objective of this paper is to describe the main molecular techniques currently available and used in clinical practice. A description is provided of the indications, limitations and analytical recommendations regarding these techniques, and the standards governing genetic counseling. Continuous rapid advances in the clinical applications of genomics have provided increased access to comprehensive molecular characterization. Laboratories are struggling to keep in pace with technology developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.