Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359737›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Bispecific PSMA antibodies and CAR-T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Kevin K Zarrabi, Vivek Narayan, Patrick J Mille, Matthew R Zibelman, Benjamin Miron, Babar Bashir, William Kevin Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Bispecific Antibodies in Solid Tumors: Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Advances in Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin K ZarrabiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-2317
Vivek NarayanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Patrick J MilleDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew R ZibelmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benjamin MironDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Babar BashirDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
William Kevin KellyDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. The treatment paradigm for prostate cancer has evolved with the emergence of a variety of novel therapies which have improved survival; however, treatment-related toxicities are abundant and durable responses remain rare. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown modest activity in a small subset of patients with prostate cancer and have not had an impact on most men with advanced disease. The discovery of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and the understanding of its specificity to prostate cancer has identified it as an ideal tumor-associated antigen and has revived the enthusiasm for immunotherapeutics in prostate cancer. T-cell immunotherapy in the form of bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have shown exceptional success in treating various hematologic malignancies, and are now being tested in patients with prostate cancer with drug design centered on various target ligands including not just PSMA, but others as well including six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA). This summative review will focus on the data surrounding PSMA-targeting T-cell therapies. Early clinical studies with both classes of T-cell redirecting therapies have demonstrated antitumor activity; however, there are multiple challenges with this class of agents, including dose-limiting toxicity, 'on-target, off-tumor' immune-related toxicity, and difficulty in maintaining sustained immune responses within a complex and overtly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Reflecting on experiences from recent trials has been key toward understanding mechanisms of immune escape and limitations in developing these drugs in prostate cancer. Newer generation BiTE and CAR T-cell constructs, either alone or as part of combination therapy, are currently under investigation with modifications in drug design to overcome these barriers. Ongoing innovation in drug development will likely foster successful implementation of T-cell immunotherapy bringing transformational change to the treatment of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodyBiTECAR-Tcastrate resistantprostate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

PMID37359737
PMCPMC10285603
OpenAlexW4380789988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.