Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359729›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2023

Customized bioceramic scaffolds and metal meshes for challenging large-size mandibular bone defect regeneration and repair.

Bin Zhang, Xiaohong Yin, Feng Zhang, Yirong Hong, Yuesheng Qiu, Xianyan Yang, Yifan Li, Cheng Zhong, Huayong Yang, Zhongru Gou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Simplified chemical deposition of CuJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-9915
Xiaohong YinState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-0290
Feng ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Yirong HongState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yuesheng QiuDepartment of Stomatology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Xianyan YangBio-Nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yifan LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Cheng ZhongDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Huayong YangState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power & Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhongru GouBio-Nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhejiang University · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang International Studies University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-size mandible graft has huge needs in clinic caused by infection, tumor, congenital deformity, bone trauma and so on. However, the reconstruction of large-size mandible defect is challenged due to its complex anatomical structure and large-range bone injury. The design and fabrication of porous implants with large segments and specific shapes matching the native mandible remain a considerable challenge. Herein, the 6% Mg-doped calcium silicate (CSi-Mg6) and β- and α-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP, α-TCP) bioceramics were fabricated by digital light processing as the porous scaffolds of over 50% in porosity, while the titanium mesh was fabricated by selective laser melting. The mechanical tests showed that the initial flexible/compressive resistance of CSi-Mg6 scaffolds was markedly higher than that of β-TCP and α-TCP scaffolds. Cell experiments showed that these materials all had good biocompatibility, while CSi-Mg6 significantly promoted cell proliferation. In the rabbit critically sized mandible bone defects (∼13 mm in length) filled with porous bioceramic scaffolds, the titanium meshes and titanium nails were acted as fixation and load bearing. The results showed that the defects were kept during the observation period in the blank (control) group; in contrast, the osteogenic capability was significantly enhanced in the CSi-Mg6 and α-TCP groups in comparison with the β-TCP group, and these two groups not only had significantly increased new bone formation but also had thicker trabecular and smaller trabecular spacing. Besides, the CSi-Mg6 and α-TCP groups showed appreciable material biodegradation in the later stage (from 8 to 12 weeks) in comparison with the β-TCP scaffolds while the CSi-Mg6 group showed much outstanding mechanical capacity

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbioceramic scaffoldscustomized designmandibular bone reconstructiontitanium meshes

Identifiers

PMID37359729
PMCPMC10287912
OpenAlexW4379744910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.