ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Establishment and validation of a ubiquitination-related gene signature associated with prognosis in pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting E3 ubiquitin ligases: Mechanistic breakthroughs and novel clinical translation pathways for tumor radioimmunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- Transcriptomic exploration combined with experimental validation: uncovering the potential value of biomarkers related to ammonia-induced cell death in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals the role of toll-like receptor signaling in pancreatic cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic and immunotherapeutic potential of disulfidptosis-associated signature in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis based on the ubiquitination- and deubiquitylation-related genes reveals the function of NEURL3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have varied prognoses that depend on numerous variables. However, additional research is required to uncover the latent impact of ubiquitination-related genes (URGs) on determining PDAC patients' prognoses. Methods: The URGs clusters were discovered via consensus clustering, and the prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across clusters were utilized to develop a signature using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis of data from TCGA-PAAD. Verification analyses were conducted across TCGA-PAAD, GSE57495 and ICGC-PACA-AU to show the robustness of the signature. RT-qPCR was used to verify the expression of risk genes. Lastly, we formulated a nomogram to improve the clinical efficacy of our predictive tool. Results: The URGs signature, comprised of three genes, was developed and was shown to be highly correlated with the prognoses of PAAD patients. The nomogram was established by combining the URGs signature with clinicopathological characteristics. We discovered that the URGs signature was remarkably superior than other individual predictors (age, grade, T stage, et al). Also, the immune microenvironment analysis indicated that ESTIMATEscore, ImmuneScores, and StromalScores were elevated in the low-risk group. The immune cells that infiltrated the tissues were different between the two groups, as did the expression of immune-related genes. Conclusion: The URGs signature could act as the biomarker of prognosis and selecting appropriate therapeutic drugs for PDAC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.