Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359345›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2023

Topic sentiment analysis based on deep neural network using document embedding technique.

Azam Seilsepour, Reza Ravanmehr, Ramin Nassiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Azam SeilsepourDepartment of Computer Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza RavanmehrDepartment of Computer Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin NassiriDepartment of Computer Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a domain- or topic-dependent task since polarity terms convey different sentiments in various domains. Hence, machine learning models trained on a specific domain cannot be employed in other domains, and existing domain-independent lexicons cannot correctly recognize the polarity of domain-specific polarity terms. Conventional approaches of Topic Sentiment Analysis perform Topic Modeling (TM) and SA sequentially, utilizing the previously trained models on irrelevant datasets for classifying sentiments that cannot provide acceptable accuracy. However, some researchers perform TM and SA simultaneously using topic-sentiment joint models, which require a list of seeds and their sentiments from widely used domain-independent lexicons. As a result, these methods cannot find the polarity of domain-specific terms correctly. This paper proposes a novel supervised hybrid TSA approach, called Embedding Topic Sentiment Analysis using Deep Neural Networks (ETSANet), that extracts the semantic relationships between the hidden topics and the training dataset using Semantically Topic-Related Documents Finder (STRDF). STRDF discovers those training documents in the same context as the topic based on the semantic relationships between the Semantic Topic Vector, a newly introduced concept that encompasses the semantic aspects of a topic, and the training dataset. Then, a hybrid CNN-GRU model is trained by these semantically topic-related documents. Moreover, a hybrid metaheuristic method utilizing Grey Wolf Optimization and Whale Optimization Algorithm is employed to fine-tune the hyperparameters of the CNN-GRU network. The evaluation results demonstrate that ETSANet increases the accuracy of the state-of-the-art methods by 1.92%.

Indexed as

CNNGRUSemantic similaritySemantic topic vectorTopic modelingTopic sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID37359345
PMCPMC10241384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.