ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2023
Topic sentiment analysis based on deep neural network using document embedding technique.
Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Enhanced IDBO-CNN-BiLSTM Model for Sentiment Analysis of Natural Disaster Tweets.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a domain- or topic-dependent task since polarity terms convey different sentiments in various domains. Hence, machine learning models trained on a specific domain cannot be employed in other domains, and existing domain-independent lexicons cannot correctly recognize the polarity of domain-specific polarity terms. Conventional approaches of Topic Sentiment Analysis perform Topic Modeling (TM) and SA sequentially, utilizing the previously trained models on irrelevant datasets for classifying sentiments that cannot provide acceptable accuracy. However, some researchers perform TM and SA simultaneously using topic-sentiment joint models, which require a list of seeds and their sentiments from widely used domain-independent lexicons. As a result, these methods cannot find the polarity of domain-specific terms correctly. This paper proposes a novel supervised hybrid TSA approach, called Embedding Topic Sentiment Analysis using Deep Neural Networks (ETSANet), that extracts the semantic relationships between the hidden topics and the training dataset using Semantically Topic-Related Documents Finder (STRDF). STRDF discovers those training documents in the same context as the topic based on the semantic relationships between the Semantic Topic Vector, a newly introduced concept that encompasses the semantic aspects of a topic, and the training dataset. Then, a hybrid CNN-GRU model is trained by these semantically topic-related documents. Moreover, a hybrid metaheuristic method utilizing Grey Wolf Optimization and Whale Optimization Algorithm is employed to fine-tune the hyperparameters of the CNN-GRU network. The evaluation results demonstrate that ETSANet increases the accuracy of the state-of-the-art methods by 1.92%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.