Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359333›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2023

Data quality model for assessing public COVID-19 big datasets.

Alladoumbaye Ngueilbaye, Joshua Zhexue Huang, Mehak Khan, Hongzhi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alladoumbaye NgueilbayeBig Data Institute, College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060 Guangdong China.
Joshua Zhexue Huang *Big Data Institute, College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060 Guangdong China.
Mehak KhanDepartment of Computer Science, AI Lab, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Hongzhi Wang *School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001 Heilongjiang China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decision-making support and evidence based on healthcare, high quality data are crucial, particularly if the emphasized knowledge is lacking. For public health practitioners and researchers, the reporting of COVID-19 data need to be accurate and easily available. Each nation has a system in place for reporting COVID-19 data, albeit these systems' efficacy has not been thoroughly evaluated. However, the current COVID-19 pandemic has shown widespread flaws in data quality. We propose a data quality model (canonical data model, four adequacy levels, and Benford's law) to assess the quality issue of COVID-19 data reporting carried out by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the six Central African Economic and Monitory Community (CEMAC) region countries between March 6,2020, and June 22, 2022, and suggest potential solutions. These levels of data quality sufficiency can be interpreted as dependability indicators and sufficiency of Big Dataset inspection. This model effectively identified the quality of the entry data for big dataset analytics. The future development of this model requires scholars and institutions from all sectors to deepen their understanding of its core concepts, improve integration with other data processing technologies, and broaden the scope of its applications.

Indexed as

4ABenford’s lawCanonical data modelCEMAC regionCOVID-19 big datasetData quality model

Identifiers

PMID37359333
PMCPMC10230148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.