Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359222›Full record

ArticleApplied research in quality of life2023

Who Gains Mental Health Benefits from Work Autonomy? The Roles of Gender and Occupational Class.

Zhuofei Lu, Senhu Wang, Yaojun Li, Xiyuan Liu, Wendy Olsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied research in quality of life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhuofei LuDepartment of Social Statistics, University of Manchester, HBS Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-3801
Senhu WangDepartment of Sociology, National University of Singapore, 11 Arts Link, #03-06 AS1, Singapore, 117573 Singapore.
Yaojun LiDepartment of Sociology and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, HBS Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Xiyuan LiuDepartment of Sociology, University of Manchester, Arthur Lewis Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Wendy OlsenDepartment of Social Statistics and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, HBS Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, improving work autonomy as an important priority in the UK labour market has been shown to enhance employee mental health and well-being. However, previous theories and empirical studies have paid little attention to the intersectional inequalities in the mental health benefits of work autonomy, preventing us from gaining a comprehensive understanding of the mental consequences of work autonomy. By integrating literature from occupational psychology, gender and social class, this study develops theoretical hypotheses regarding whether and how the mental health benefits of work autonomy vary alongside the intersectional axes of gender and occupational class and tests these hypotheses using long-term panel data in the UK (2010-2021). Overall, we find that those from higher occupational class and male employees acquire significantly more mental health benefits from high work autonomy compared with those from lower occupational class and female employees. Moreover, further analyses show significant intersectional inequalities of gender and occupational class. While male employees from all occupational classes gain significant mental health benefits from work autonomy, only female employees from higher (but not lower) occupational classes benefit from work autonomy. These findings contribute to the literature in the sociology of work by demonstrating the intersectional inequalities in mental health consequences of work autonomy, especially for women in the lower occupational class, highlighting the need for a more gender- and occupation-sensitive design in future labour market policies.

Indexed as

Job qualityMental healthOccupational statusesWork autonomyWorkplace interventions

Identifiers

PMID37359222
PMCPMC9990038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.