ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2021
A study of crystalluria: effectiveness of including hygienic-dietary recommendations in laboratory reports.
Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity and distribution of extracellular microcrystals in holothuroid echinoderms.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of incorporating hygienic-dietary recommendations in laboratory reports in reducing the incidence of renal colic (RC). A study was performed to compare the incidence of RC in two groups of patients who had suffered at least a crystalluria event associated with the risk of urolithiasis. Recommendations were only incorporated in the laboratory reports of one group. Methods: A retrospective observational study. The study sample was composed of patients who had at least an episode of crystalluria associated with a higher risk of urolithiasis. The laboratory reports of patients in Group A (n=1,115), treated in 2017, did not include any hygienic-dietary recommendations, whereas patients in Group B (n=1,692), treated in 2018, received hygienic-dietary recommendations through their laboratory reports. χ Results: The incidence of RC was 2.02 times higher in group A (2.24%) than in group B (1.12%). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of RC based on the type of urinary crystal. The incidence of RC was substantially higher in patients who suffered at least an event of crystalluria associated with a higher risk for urolithiasis as compared to the general population during the same period (0.46%, consistently with the incidence rates reported in the literature). Conclusions: The incorporation of messages alerting on the risk of urolithiasis and the inclusion of hygienic-dietary recommendations in laboratory reports may be useful for reducing the incidence of RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.