Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359199›Full record

ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2021

Biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

Manuel H Janeiro, Carlos G Ardanaz, Noemí Sola-Sevilla, Jinya Dong, María Cortés-Erice, Maite Solas, Elena Puerta, María J Ramírez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. d‑Glucose-Conjugated Benzo[ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Thionine modulates tau phosphorylation in an Alzheimer's disease cell culture model.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel H JaneiroDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Carlos G ArdanazDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Noemí Sola-SevillaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jinya DongDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María Cortés-EriceDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Maite SolasDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Elena PuertaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María J RamírezDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Universidad de Navarra · ESNavarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. AD is the main cause of dementia worldwide and aging is the main risk factor for developing the illness. AD classical diagnostic criteria rely on clinical data. However, the development of a biological definition of AD using biomarkers that reflect the underling neuropathology is needed. Content: The aim of this review is to describe the main outcomes when measuring classical and novel biomarkers in biological fluids or neuroimaging. Summary: Nowadays, there are three classical biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD: Aβ42, t-Tau and p-Tau. The diagnostic use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers is limited due to invasive collection by lumbar puncture with potential side effects. Plasma/serum measurements are the gold standard in clinics, because they are minimally invasive and, in consequence, easily collected and processed. The two main proteins implicated in the pathological process, Aβ and Tau, can be visualized using neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography. Outlook: As it is currently accepted that AD starts decades before clinical symptoms could be diagnosed, the opportunity to detect biological alterations prior to clinical symptoms would allow early diagnosis or even perhaps change treatment possibilities.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebloodcerebrospinal fluidcognitive deficitmild cognitive impairmentneuroimagingβ-amyloid

Identifiers

PMID37359199
PMCPMC10197496
OpenAlexW3109800898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.