Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359151›Full record

ArticleDEN open2024

Technical outcomes and postprocedural courses of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for possible gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A series of 48 cases (with video).

Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Shun Nakagome, Tsugumi Habu, Yumiko Ishikawa, Kumiko Kirita, Hiroto Noda, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Teppei Akimoto and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eriko KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Osamu GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-6323
Shun NakagomeDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Tsugumi HabuDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Yumiko IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kumiko KiritaDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Hiroto NodaDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kazutoshi HiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-6288
Takeshi OndaDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Teppei AkimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7472-5210
Jun OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Naohiko AkimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Katsuhiko IwakiriDepartment of Gastroenterology Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JPNippon Medical School Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) has been introduced as an alternative to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for tissue sampling of subepithelial lesions. However, there have been few reports on MIAB, and the evidence is lacking, particularly in small lesions. In this case series, we investigated the technical outcomes and postprocedural influences of MIAB for gastric subepithelial lesions 10 mm or greater in size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases with the intraluminal growth type of possible gastrointestinal stromal tumors, in which MIAB was performed at a single institution between October 2020 and August 2022. Technical success, adverse events, and clinical courses following the procedure were evaluated. Results: In 48 MIAB cases with a median tumor diameter of 16 mm, the success rate of tissue sampling and the diagnostic rate were 96% and 92%, respectively. Two biopsies were considered sufficient for making the definitive diagnosis. Postoperative bleeding occurred in one case (2%). In 24 cases, surgery has performed a median of two months after MIAB, and no unfavorable findings caused by MIAB were seen intraoperatively. Finally, 23 cases were histologically diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and no patients who underwent MIAB experienced recurrence or metastasis during a median observation period of 13 months. Conclusions: The data indicated that MIAB appears feasible, safe, and useful for histological diagnosis of gastric intraluminal growth types of possible gastrointestinal stromal tumors, even those of a small size. Postprocedural clinical effects were considered negligible.

Indexed as

gastric subepithelial lesiongastrointestinal stromal tumormucosal incision‐assisted biopsypostprocedural coursetechnical outcome

Identifiers

PMID37359151
PMCPMC10288069
OpenAlexW4381849409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.