ArticleDEN open2024
Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination and open access database with artificial intelligence: The SEE-artificial intelligence project.
Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Capsule Endoscopy for Detection of Small Bowel Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Improved Efficiency and Lesion Detection in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Using the Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Model SEE-AI.DEN open · 2027Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From data to artificial intelligence: evaluating the readiness of gastrointestinal endoscopy datasets.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and Validation of a Multi-Task Artificial Intelligence-Assisted System for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Pixel-wise annotation for clear and contaminated regions segmentation in wireless capsule endoscopy images: A multicentre database.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Establishing an AI model and application for automated capsule endoscopy recognition based on convolutional neural networks (with video).BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) may be practical for image classification of small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE). However, creating a functional AI model is challenging. We attempted to create a dataset and an object detection CE AI model to explore modeling problems to assist in reading small bowel CE. Methods: We extracted 18,481 images from 523 small bowel CE procedures performed at Kyushu University Hospital from September 2014 to June 2021. We annotated 12,320 images with 23,033 disease lesions, combined them with 6161 normal images as the dataset, and examined the characteristics. Based on the dataset, we created an object detection AI model using YOLO v5 and we tested validation. Results: We annotated the dataset with 12 types of annotations, and multiple annotation types were observed in the same image. We test validated our AI model with 1396 images, and sensitivity for all 12 types of annotations was about 91%, with 1375 true positives, 659 false positives, and 120 false negatives detected. The highest sensitivity for individual annotations was 97%, and the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98, but the quality of detection varied depending on the specific annotation. Conclusions: Object detection AI model in small bowel CE using YOLO v5 may provide effective and easy-to-understand reading assistance. In this SEE-AI project, we open our dataset, the weights of the AI model, and a demonstration to experience our AI. We look forward to further improving the AI model in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.