Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359150›Full record

ArticleDEN open2024

Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination and open access database with artificial intelligence: The SEE-artificial intelligence project.

Akihito Yokote, Junji Umeno, Keisuke Kawasaki, Shin Fujioka, Yuta Fuyuno, Yuichi Matsuno, Yuichiro Yoshida, Noriyuki Imazu, Satoshi Miyazono, Tomohiko Moriyama and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akihito YokoteDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-8967
Junji UmenoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Keisuke KawasakiDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Shin FujiokaDepartment of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Yuta FuyunoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Yuichi MatsunoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Yuichiro YoshidaDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Noriyuki ImazuDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Satoshi MiyazonoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Tomohiko MoriyamaInternational Medical Department Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Takanari KitazonoDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Takehiro TorisuDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science Graduate School of Medical Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-2549
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) may be practical for image classification of small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE). However, creating a functional AI model is challenging. We attempted to create a dataset and an object detection CE AI model to explore modeling problems to assist in reading small bowel CE. Methods: We extracted 18,481 images from 523 small bowel CE procedures performed at Kyushu University Hospital from September 2014 to June 2021. We annotated 12,320 images with 23,033 disease lesions, combined them with 6161 normal images as the dataset, and examined the characteristics. Based on the dataset, we created an object detection AI model using YOLO v5 and we tested validation. Results: We annotated the dataset with 12 types of annotations, and multiple annotation types were observed in the same image. We test validated our AI model with 1396 images, and sensitivity for all 12 types of annotations was about 91%, with 1375 true positives, 659 false positives, and 120 false negatives detected. The highest sensitivity for individual annotations was 97%, and the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98, but the quality of detection varied depending on the specific annotation. Conclusions: Object detection AI model in small bowel CE using YOLO v5 may provide effective and easy-to-understand reading assistance. In this SEE-AI project, we open our dataset, the weights of the AI model, and a demonstration to experience our AI. We look forward to further improving the AI model in the future.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecapsule endoscopydiagnostic imaginggastrointestinal tractintestine small

Identifiers

PMID37359150
PMCPMC10288072
OpenAlexW4381849427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.