Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359142›Full record

ArticleJAACAP open2023

The Coronavirus Impact Scale: Construction, Validation, and Comparisons in Diverse Clinical Samples.

Joel Stoddard, Elizabeth Reynolds, Ruth Paris, Simone P Haller, Sara B Johnson, Jodi Zik, Eliza Elliotte, Mihoko Maru, Allison L Jaffe, Ajitha Mallidi and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAACAP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health of the Pandemic Dementia Paid Staff and Unpaid Caregiver Workforce in Congregate Care and Community Settings.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COVID-19 impacts and inequities among underserved communities with diabetes.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joel StoddardUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Elizabeth ReynoldsJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Ruth ParisBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts.
Simone P HallerNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sara B JohnsonJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Jodi ZikUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Eliza ElliotteUniversity of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Mihoko MaruBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts.
Allison L JaffeNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ajitha MallidiNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ashley R SmithNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Raquel G HernandezJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Heather E VolkJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Melissa A BrotmanNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Joan KaufmanJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.
National Institute of Mental Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USBoston University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

fMRI Studies Of Pediatric Mood And Anxiety DisordersZIAMH002781 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PINE, DANIEL · 2009 to 2025
$41.5M
The Pathophysiology and Treatment Of Children With Severe Mood DysregulationZIAMH002786 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEIBENLUFT, ELLEN · 2009 to 2023
$34.0M
Unit on Neuroscience and Novel TherapeuticsZIAMH002969 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BROTMAN, MELISSA · 2019 to 2025
$13.8M
Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Stewart H Mostofsky · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Pathways for Physician Scientist Training in Psychiatric ResearchR25MH125758 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI C. Neill EPPERSON, Susan Kay Mikulich-Gilbertson · 2021 to 2026
$980k
Neurocognitive Targets of Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat IrritabilityK23MH113731 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STODDARD, JOEL JOHNSON · 2017 to 2020
$764k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002781Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002786NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH113731NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH125758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This report is of the construction and initial psychometric properties of the Coronavirus Impact Scale in multiple large and diverse samples of families with children and adolescents. The scale was established to capture the impact of the coronavirus pandemic during its first wave. Differences in impact between samples and internal structure within samples were assessed. Method: A total of 572 caregivers of children and adolescents or expecting mothers in diverse clinical and research settings completed the Coronavirus Impact Scale. Samples differed in regard to developmental stage, background, inpatient/outpatient status, and primary research or clinical setting. Model free methods were used to measure the scale's internal structure and to determine a scoring method. Differences between samples in specific item responses were measured by multivariate ordinal regression. Results: The Coronavirus Impact Scale demonstrated good internal consistency in a variety of clinical and research populations. Across the groups studied, single, immigrant, predominantly Latinx mothers of young children reported the greatest impact of the pandemic, with noteworthy effects on food access and finances reported. Individuals receiving outpatient or inpatient care reported greater impacts on health care access. Elevated scores on the Coronavirus Impact Scale were positively associated with measures of caregiver anxiety and both caregiver- and child-reported stress at a moderate effect size. Conclusion: The Coronavirus Impact Scale is a publicly available scale with adequate psychometric properties for use in measuring the impact of the coronavirus pandemic in diverse populations.

Indexed as

adolescencecoronavirusCOVID-19mental healthrisk and resilience

Identifiers

PMID37359142
PMCPMC10010775
OpenAlexW4324030843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.