Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359140›Full record

ArticleBioSocieties2023

Citizenship in times of crisis: biosocial state-citizen relations during COVID-19 in Austria.

Isabella M Radhuber, Christian Haddad, Katharina Kieslich, Katharina T Paul, Barbara Prainsack, Seliem El-Sayed, Lukas Schlogl, Wanda Spahl, Elias Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioSocieties, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isabella M RadhuberAustrian Science Fund, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8176-5045
Christian HaddadDepartment of Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina KieslichDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina T PaulDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara PrainsackDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Seliem El-SayedDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas SchloglDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wanda SpahlDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elias WeissDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 561Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 1433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing upon 152 in-depth qualitative interviews with residents in Austria carried out in the first year of the pandemic, this article discusses how people's experiences with COVID-19 policies reflect and reshape state-citizen relations. Coinciding with a significant government crisis, the first year of COVID-19 in Austria saw pandemic measures justified with reference to a biological, often medical understanding of health that framed disease prevention in terms of transmission reduction, often with reference to metrics such as hospitalisation rates, etc. Instead of using this biomedical frame, our interviewees, however, drew attention to biopsychosocial dimensions of the crisis and problematised the entanglements between economy and health. We call this the emergence of a

Indexed as

AustriaBiosocial citizenshipCOVID-19Pandemic policiesQualitative interviewsState–citizen relations

Identifiers

PMID37359140
PMCPMC10201040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.