Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359131›Full record

ArticleCommunications earth & environment2021

Perceived global increase in algal blooms is attributable to intensified monitoring and emerging bloom impacts.

Gustaaf M Hallegraeff, Donald M Anderson, Catherine Belin, Marie-Yasmine Bottein, Eileen Bresnan, Mireille Chinain, Henrik Enevoldsen, Mitsunori Iwataki, Bengt Karlson, Cynthia H McKenzie and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications earth & environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
36.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 474 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Beyond ICACS omega · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unveiling the 2017Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 18 institutions in 13 countries.

Gustaaf M HallegraeffInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Donald M AndersonWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole MA 02543, USA.
Catherine BelinIFREMER, F-44311 Nantes Cedex 03, France.
Marie-Yasmine BotteinInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Environment Laboratories, 4a Quai Antoine 1er, 98000 Monaco; present address: 1 Passage des pignes, 06560 Valbonne, France.
Eileen BresnanMarine Scotland, Aberdeen, Scotland, U.K.
Mireille ChinainLaboratory of Marine Biotoxins, Institut Louis Malardé-UMR241 EIO, BP 30, 98713 Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia.
Henrik EnevoldsenIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO IOC Science and Communication Centre on Harmful Algae, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mitsunori IwatakiAsian Natural Environmental Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Bengt KarlsonSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Oceanographic Research, Sven Källfelts gata 15, 426 71 Västra Frölunda, Sweden.
Cynthia H McKenzieNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5X1.
Inés SunesenCONICET - UNLP, División Ficología Dr. Sebastián Guarrera, FCNyM, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900, La Plata, Argentina.
Grant C PitcherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Pieter ProvoostIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, IOC Project Office for IODE, Oostende, Belgium.
Anthony RichardsonCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland BioSciences Precinct (QBP), Saint Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
Laura SchweiboldInstitut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Plouzané, France.
Patricia A TesterOcean Tester, LLC, 295 Dills Point Road, Beaufort, North Carolina, 28516, USA.
Vera L TrainerEnvironmental and Fisheries Sciences Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2725 Montlake Blvd E, Seattle, WA 98112, USA.
Aletta T YñiguezMarine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Adriana ZingoneStazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AUFisheries and Oceans Canada · CAIfremer · FRInstitut Louis Malardé · PFInstitut Universitaire Européen de la Mer · FRInternational Atomic Energy Agency · ITMarine Scotland · GBNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · USStazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn · ITSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute · SETechnical College of the Lowcountry · USThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of the Philippines Diliman · PHWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · US

Funding

Woods Hole Center for Oceans and Human HealthP01ES028938 · NIEHS · WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION · PI DENNIS J MCGILLICUDDY · 2018 to 2026
$5.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES028938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global trends in the occurrence, toxicity and risk posed by harmful algal blooms to natural systems, human health and coastal economies are poorly constrained, but are widely thought to be increasing due to climate change and nutrient pollution. Here, we conduct a statistical analysis on a global dataset extracted from the Harmful Algae Event Database and Ocean Biodiversity Information System for the period 1985-2018 to investigate temporal trends in the frequency and distribution of marine harmful algal blooms. We find no uniform global trend in the number of harmful algal events and their distribution over time, once data were adjusted for regional variations in monitoring effort. Varying and contrasting regional trends were driven by differences in bloom species, type and emergent impacts. Our findings suggest that intensified monitoring efforts associated with increased aquaculture production are responsible for the perceived increase in harmful algae events and that there is no empirical support for broad statements regarding increasing global trends. Instead, trends need to be considered regionally and at the species level.

Identifiers

PMID37359131
PMCPMC10289804
OpenAlexW3171366087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.