Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37359117›Full record

ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2023

Efficacy for diagnoses of scirrhous gastric cancer and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ryuhei Jinushi, Masafumi Mizuide, Yuki Tanisaka, Sakue Masuda, Kazuya Koizumi, Akiko Sasaki, Yo Ishihara, Kento Shionoya, Ryo Sato, Kei Sugimoto and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryuhei JinushiGraduate School of Medicine International University of Health and Welfare Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-6723
Masafumi MizuideDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Yuki TanisakaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2765-3306
Sakue MasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Kazuya KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Akiko SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Yo IshiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Kento ShionoyaDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-4797
Ryo SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Kei SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Takahiro ShinDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Rie ShiomiDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Akashi FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-0512
Shomei RyozawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Tsutomu YamazakiGraduate School of Medicine International University of Health and Welfare Tokyo Japan.
Saitama International Medical Center · JPShonan Kamakura General Hospital · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC) is diagnosed using endoscopy and/or biopsy; however, SGC diagnosis remains challenging owing to its special growth form and morphologic features. Hence, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), which is minimally invasive and has a high proportion of diagnostic tissue, may be an alternative investigative modality for patients with suspected SGC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and evaluate the evidence for the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected SGC. We conducted a systematic review using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Ichushi-Web (NPO Japan Medical Abstracts Society) databases and included all entries in which SGC was evaluated using EUS-FNA in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement from the databases' inception to October 10, 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of SGC diagnosed using EUS-FNA. In addition, we analyzed the proportion of adverse events associated with EUS-FNA. The electronic search identified 1890 studies; overall, four studies met the selection criteria and reported data on EUS-FNA performed on 114 patients with suspected SGC. The overall diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for SGC was 82.6% (95% confidence interval, 74.6-90.6%) and the statistical heterogeneity was 0% (

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspirationgastroscopylinitis plasticascirrhous

Identifiers

PMID37359117
PMCPMC10290272
OpenAlexW4380877779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.