Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358938›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Dual-center validation of using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics to predict stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes.

David A DeVries, Terence Tang, Ghada Alqaidy, Ali Albweady, Andrew Leung, Joanna Laba, Frank Lagerwaard, Jaap Zindler, George Hajdok, Aaron D Ward

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Morphological MRI features as prognostic indicators in brain metastases.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David A DeVriesDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Terence TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada.
Ghada AlqaidyRadiodiagnostic and Medical Imaging Department, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlbweadyDepartment of Radiology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia.
Andrew LeungDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Joanna LabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada.
Frank LagerwaardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap ZindlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
George HajdokDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Aaron D WardDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: MRI radiomic features and machine learning have been used to predict brain metastasis (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes. Previous studies used only single-center datasets, representing a significant barrier to clinical translation and further research. This study, therefore, presents the first dual-center validation of these techniques. Methods: SRS datasets were acquired from 2 centers ( Results: Training a model with one center's dataset and testing it with the other center's dataset required using a set of features important for outcome prediction at both centers, and achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values up to 0.70. A model training methodology developed using the first center's dataset was locked and externally validated with the second center's dataset, achieving a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.80. Lastly, models trained on pooled data from both centers offered balanced accuracy across centers with an overall bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.78. Conclusions: Using the presented validated methodology, radiomic models trained at a single center can be used externally, though they must utilize features important across all centers. These models' accuracies are inferior to those of models trained using each individual center's data. Pooling data across centers shows accurate and balanced performance, though further validation is required.

Indexed as

brain metastasismachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingradiomicsstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID37358938
PMCPMC10289521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.