Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358853›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Access and Racial Disparities in Food Insecurity.

Laura J Samuel, Deidra C Crews, Bonnielin K Swenor, Jiafeng Zhu, Elizabeth A Stuart, Sarah L Szanton, Boeun Kim, Pallavi Dwivedi, Qiwei Li, Nicholas S Reed and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura J SamuelJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Deidra C CrewsDivision of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Bonnielin K SwenorJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jiafeng ZhuBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth A StuartBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sarah L SzantonJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Boeun KimJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pallavi DwivediJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Qiwei LiJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nicholas S ReedBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Roland J ThorpeBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Why Place MattersU54MD000214 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THORPE, ROLAND J. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
The role structural discrimination on depression, sleep, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive declineDP1AG069874 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SZANTON, SARAH L · 2020 to 2024
$4.1M
Stress and Mortality Among Black MenK02AG059140 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THORPE, ROLAND J. · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
The Role of Hearing Loss in Health Care Outcomes.K23AG065443 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REED, NICHOLAS SALVATORE · 2020 to 2024
$943k
Household income, financial stress and physiologic aging markers in low income adults across the life courseK01AG054751 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMUEL, LAURA · 2018 to 2022
$651k
Patient-Oriented Research Addressing Disparities in Hypertension and Kidney DiseaseK24HL148181 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CREWS, DEIDRA CANDICE · 2019 to 2023
$541k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148181NIA NIH HHS DP1 AG069874NIA NIH HHS K01 AG054751NIA NIH HHS K02 AG059140NIA NIH HHS K23 AG065443NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD000214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Racially minoritized people experience disproportionately high rates of food insecurity. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduces food insecurity. Objective: To evaluate SNAP access with regard to racial disparities in food insecurity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2018 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). On the basis of random sampling strategies, 44 870 households were eligible for the SIPP, and 26 215 (58.4%) participated. Sampling weights accounted for survey design and nonresponse. Data were analyzed from February 25 to December 12, 2022. Exposures: This study examined disparities based on household racial composition (entirely Asian, entirely Black, entirely White, and multiple races or multirace based on SIPP categories). Main Outcomes and Measures: Food insecurity during the prior year was measured using the validated 6-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module. SNAP participation during the prior year was classified based on whether anyone in the household received SNAP benefits. Modified Poisson regression tested hypothesized disparities in food insecurity. Results: A total of 4974 households that were eligible for SNAP (income ≤130% of the poverty threshold) were included in this study. A total of 218 households (5%) were entirely Asian, 1014 (22%) were entirely Black, 3313 (65%) were entirely White, and 429 (8%) were multiracial or of other racial groups. Adjusting for household characteristics, households that were entirely Black (prevalence rate [PR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33) or multiracial (PR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46) were more likely to be food insecure than entirely White households, but associations differed depending on SNAP participation. Among households that did not participate in SNAP, those that were entirely Black (PR, 1.52; 97.5% CI, 1.20-1.93) or multiracial (PR, 1.42; 97.5% CI, 1.04-1.94) were more likely to be food insecure than White households; however, among SNAP participants, Black households were less likely than White households to be food insecure (PR, 0.84; 97.5% CI, 0.71-0.99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, racial disparities in food insecurity were found among low-income households that do not participate in SNAP but not among those that do, suggesting that access to SNAP should be improved. These results also highlight the need to examine the structural and systemic racism in food systems and in access to food assistance that may contribute to disparities.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFood InsecurityRacial GroupsAsianBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPovertyWhite

Identifiers

PMID37358853
PMCPMC10293911
OpenAlexW4382011226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.