ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2023
Utility of FFRCT in Patients with Chest Pain.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative plaque characterization, pericoronary fat attenuation index, and fractional flow reserve: a novel method for differentiating between stable and unstable angina pectoris in a case-control study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Predictive value of modified early warning score and risk stratification for adverse cardiovascular events in acute chest pain patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Quantification and Visualization of CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Ischemia-Causing Coronary Arteries.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Coronary Physiological Assessment Derived From Computed Tomography.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease: Beyond Lumen Assessment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe goal of this article is to review the data supporting the use of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR REVIEW
findingsNumerous clinical trials have demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be improved with the use of FFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
37358803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.