Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358752›Full record

SynthesisJournal of patient-reported outcomes2023

Falls risk perception measures in hospital: a COSMIN systematic review.

Elissa Dabkowski, Karen Missen, Jhodie Duncan, Simon Cooper

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elissa DabkowskiInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Northways Road, Churchill, VIC, 3842, Australia. e.dabkowski@federation.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-0698
Karen MissenInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Northways Road, Churchill, VIC, 3842, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-6297
Jhodie DuncanResearch Unit, Latrobe Regional Hospital, Traralgon West, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7996-4969
Simon CooperHealth Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5561-3099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls prevention in hospital continues to be a research priority because of the poor health outcomes and financial burdens that can arise. Recently updated World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management strongly recommend evaluating patients' concerns about falling as part of a multifactorial assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of falls risk perception measures for adults in a hospital setting. This review was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines and provides a comprehensive summary of these instruments, including psychometric properties, feasibility and clinical recommendations for their use. The review followed a prospectively registered protocol, in which a total of ten databases were searched between the years 2002 and 2022. Studies were included if the instruments measured falls risk perception and/or other psychological falls constructs, if they were conducted in a hospital setting and if the target population contained hospital inpatients. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 20 falls risk perception measures. These falls risk perception instruments were grouped into five falls-related constructs: Balance Confidence, Falls Efficacy/Concern, Fear of Falling, Self-Awareness and Behaviour/Intention. Two of the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) received Class A recommendations (Falls Risk Perception Questionnaire and the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale); however, this rating is only applicable for the populations/context described in the studies. Thirteen PROMs received Class B recommendations, solidifying the need for further validation studies of these PROMs.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFearAdultConsensusHumansPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOSMINFall preventionFallsFalls riskHospitalPatientPerception

Identifiers

PMID37358752
PMCPMC10293508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.