Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358724›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2023

Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Manuela Monrabal Lezama, Nicholas S Murdoch Duncan, Sofia Bertona, Francisco Schlottmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuela Monrabal LezamaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nicholas S Murdoch DuncanDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sofia BertonaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Francisco SchlottmannDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. fschlottmann@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-0559
Hospital Alemán · ARUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality. Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer still have a poor prognosis due to its advanced presentation at diagnosis, even in countries with developed screening programs. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for gastric cancer, often combined with perioperative chemotherapy. Lymph node dissection is a crucial component of the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. D1 lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for early stage tumors. The extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer, however, is still a matter of debate between Eastern and Western surgeons. Although a D2 dissection is the current standard recommended by most guidelines, there might be a place for more limited dissections such as D1 + in selected cases. This evidence-based review will help defining the optimal lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsSurgeonsGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionD1 dissectionD2 dissectionD3 dissectionGastric cancerLymphadenectomy

Identifiers

PMID37358724
OpenAlexW4382010552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.