Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358664›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2023

Comparison of four different screw configurations for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy: a finite element analysis.

Faruk Aykanat, Ozkan Kose, Bulent Guneri, H Kursat Celik, Albert Cakar, Ersin Tasatan, Mihaela-Elena Ulmeanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Faruk AykanatVocational School of Health Services, SANKO University, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-1565
Ozkan KoseDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Varlık mah., Kazım Karabekir cd., Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey. drozkankose@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-9635
Bulent GuneriDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Education and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-7531
H Kursat CelikAgricultural Faculty, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technology Engineering, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8154-6993
Albert CakarDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-2208
Ersin TasatanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-0320
Mihaela-Elena UlmeanuDepartment of Manufacturing, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-7122
Akdeniz University · TRAntalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Eye Hospital · TRSanko University · TRUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventionally, two 4.5 mm cortical screws inserted toward the posterior tibial cortex are usually advocated for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. This finite element analysis aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations to fix the Fulkerson osteotomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsFulkerson osteotomy was modeled using computerized tomography (CT) data of a patient with patellofemoral instability and fixed with four different screw configurations using two 4.5 mm cortical screws in the axial plane. The configurations were as follows: (1) two screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, (2) two screws perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, (3) the upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane, but the lower screw is perpendicular to the posterior cortex of the tibia, and (4) the reverse position of the screw configuration in the third scenario. Gap formation, sliding, displacement, frictional stress, and deformation of the components were calculated and reported.

resultsThe osteotomy fragment moved superiorly after loading the models with 1654 N patellar tendon traction force. Since the proximal cut is sloped (bevel-cut osteotomy), the osteotomy fragment slid and rested on the upper tibial surface. Afterward, the upper surface of the osteotomy fragment acted as a fulcrum, and the distal part of the fragment began to separate from the tibia while the screws resisted the displacement. The resultant total displacement was 0.319 mm, 0.307 mm, 0.333 mm, and 0.245 mm from the first scenario to the fourth scenario, respectively. The minimum displacement was detected in the fourth scenario (upper screw perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and lower screw perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex). Maximum frictional stress and maximum pressure between components on both surfaces were highest in the first scenario (both screws perpendicular to the osteotomy plane).

conclusionsA divergent screw configuration in which the upper screw is inserted perpendicular to the osteotomy plane and the lower screw is inserted perpendicular to the posterior tibial cortex might be a better option for the fixation of Fulkerson osteotomy. Level of evidence Level V, mechanism-based reasoning.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsTibiaBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOsteotomyBiomechanicsFinite element analysisFulkerson osteotomyScrew fixationTibial tubercle osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID37358664
PMCPMC10293552
OpenAlexW4382011315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.