Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358652›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

A deep learning MRI-based signature may provide risk-stratification strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Chen Yang, Yuan Chen, Luchao Zhu, Liansheng Wang, Qin Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Luchao ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.
Liansheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China. lswang@xmu.edu.cn.
Qin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China. linqin05@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-8706

Funding

Key Medical and Health Projects in Xiamen 3502Z20209002National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772893Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J011220Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J011236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is influenced by various factors, making it difficult for clinical physicians to predict the outcome, the objective of this study was to develop a deep learning-based signature for risk stratification in NPC patients.

methodsA total of 293 patients were enrolled in the study and divided into training, validation, and testing groups with a ratio of 7:1:2. MRI scans and corresponding clinical information were collected, and the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was chosen as the endpoint. The Res-Net18 algorithm was used to develop two deep learning (DL) models and another solely based on clinical characteristics developed by multivariate cox analysis. The performance of both models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and the concordance index (C-index). Discriminative performance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

resultsThe deep learning approach identified DL prognostic models. The MRI-based DL model showed significantly better performance compared to the traditional model solely based on clinical characteristics (AUC: 0.8861 vs 0.745, p = 0.04 and C-index: 0.865 vs 0.727, p = 0.03). The survival analysis showed significant survival differences between the risk groups identified by the MRI-based model.

conclusionOur study highlights the potential of MRI in predicting the prognosis of NPC through DL algorithm. This approach has the potential to become a novel tool for prognosis prediction and can help physicians to develop more valid treatment strategies in the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDeep learningMRINasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognosisRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.