ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023
Rapid and visual detection of specific bacteria for saliva and vaginal fluid identification with the lateral flow dipstick strategy.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dual-marker approach for forensic age prediction: integrating the salivary microbiome and antibiotic resistome.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the identification of vaginal fluid for forensic applications.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Geographical traceability of bacteria based on a systematic stable isotope analysis method.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Review
- A rapid identification system for vaginal fluid stains based on nested recombinant polymerase amplification and lateral flow dipstick.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of body fluids is critical for crime scene reconstruction, and a source of investigation source of investigative leads. In recent years, microbial DNA analysis using sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction have been used to identify body fluids. However, these techniques are time-consuming, expensive, and require complex workflows. In this study, a new method for simultaneous detection of Streptococcus salivarius and Lactobacillus crispatus using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in combination with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD) was developed to identify saliva and vaginal fluid in forensic samples. LFD results can be observed with the naked eye within 3 min with a sensitivity of 0.001 ng/µL DNA. The PCR-LFD assay was successfully used to detect S. salivarius and L. crispatus in saliva and vaginal fluid respectively, and showed negative results in blood, semen, nasal fluid, and skin. Moreover, saliva and vaginal fluid were detectable even at an extremely high mixing ratio of sample DNA (1:999). Saliva and vaginal fluid were identified in various mock forensic samples. These results indicate that saliva and vaginal fluid can be effectively detected by identifying S. salivarius and L. crispatus, respectively. Furthermore, we have shown that DNA samples used to identify saliva and vaginal fluid can also provide a complete short tandem repeat (STR) profile when used as source material for forensic STR profiling. In summary, our results suggest that PCR-LFD is a promising assay for rapid, simple, reliable, and efficient identification of body fluids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37358650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.