Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357864›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Radial bias in face identification.

Alexia Roux-Sibilon, Carole Peyrin, John A Greenwood, Valérie Goffaux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07727369 (RePer-AGE), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07727369 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

RePer-AGE: Reorganization of Visuo-cognitive Functions Based on Peripheral Vision With Aging

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2026 to 2030Enrolled160ConditionsAging, Visual Perception, CognitionArmsPsychophysical visual recognition tasks, Ophthalmological assessment, Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radial bias in face identification.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexia Roux-SibilonPsychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UC Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3810-0109
Carole PeyrinUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-092X
John A GreenwoodDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-0818
Valérie GoffauxPsychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UC Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3182-7011
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUCLouvain · BEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human vision in the periphery is most accurate for stimuli that point towards the fovea. This so-called radial bias has been linked with the organization and spatial selectivity of neurons at the lowest levels of the visual system, from retinal ganglion cells onwards. Despite evidence that the human visual system is radially biased, it is not yet known whether this bias persists at higher levels of processing, or whether high-level representations are invariant to this low-level orientation bias. We used the case of face identity recognition to address this question. The specialized high-level mechanisms that support efficient face recognition are highly dependent on horizontally oriented information, which convey the most useful identity cues in the fovea. We show that face selective mechanisms are more sensitive on the horizontal meridian (to the left and right of fixation) compared to the vertical meridian (above and below fixation), suggesting that the horizontal cues in the face are better extracted on the horizontal meridian, where they align with the radial bias. The results demonstrate that the radial bias is maintained at high-level recognition stages and emphasize the importance of accounting for the radial bias in future investigation of visual recognition processes in peripheral vision.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionOrientationFovea CentralisHumansPhotic StimulationVisual Perceptionface identificationhorizontal tuningorientationperipheral visionradial bias

Identifiers

PMID37357864
PMCPMC10291718
OpenAlexW4382010511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.