Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357863›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Soil moisture incidentally selects for microbes that facilitate locally adaptive plant response.

Kevin D Ricks, Anthony C Yannarell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin D RicksProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-8900
Anthony C YannarellProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a plant's microbiome can facilitate adaptive phenotypes, the plant's role in selecting for these microbes is unclear. Do plants actively recruit microbes beneficial to their current environment, or are beneficial microbes only an incidental by-product of microbial adaptation? We addressed these questions through a multigeneration greenhouse experiment, selecting for either dry- or wet-adapted soil microbial communities, either with or without plants. After three plant generations, we conducted a full reciprocal transplant of each soil community onto wet- and dry-treated plants. We found that plants generally benefited from soil microbes, and this benefit was greater whenever their current watering conditions matched the microbes' historical watering conditions. Principally, the plant's presence was not necessary in the historical treatments for this environmental matching benefit to emerge. Moreover, we found microbes from droughted soils could better tolerate drought stress. Taken together, these results suggest that the moisture environment selects for microbes that benefit plants under those specific moisture conditions, and that these beneficial properties arise as a by-product of microbial adaptation to the watering environment and not as a co-adapting plant-microbe system. This work highlights that understanding the selective agents on these plant-associated microbes will lead to a better understanding of plant adaptation.

Indexed as

PlantsSoilAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalSoil MicrobiologyWaterSoilWateradaptationby-productsdroughtplant–microbe interactionsselection

Identifiers

PMID37357863
PMCPMC10291722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.