ArticleProteins2023
Combining pairwise structural similarity and deep learning interface contact prediction to estimate protein complex model accuracy in CASP15.
Article in Proteins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Step-by-Step Protocol for Efficient Global Accuracy Estimation of Protein Complex Structural Models with MViewEMA.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Efficient global accuracy estimation for protein complex structural models using multi-view representation learning.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Protein-Ligand Structure and Affinity Prediction in CASP16 Using a Geometric Deep Learning Ensemble and Flow Matching.Proteins · 2026Article
- Improving AlphaFold2- and AlphaFold3-Based Protein Complex Structure Prediction With MULTICOM4 in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- DeepUMQA-X: Comprehensive and insightful estimation of model accuracy for protein single-chain and complex.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A Labeled Dataset for AI-based Cryo-EM Map Enhancement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Estimating protein complex model accuracy using graph transformers and pairwise similarity graphs.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Physical-aware model accuracy estimation for protein complex using deep learning method.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Article
- Enhancing alphafold-multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.Communications biology · 2023Article
- DeepUMQA3: a web server for accurate assessment of interface residue accuracy in protein complexes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Structural Modeling of Cytokine-Receptor-JAK2 Signaling Complexes Using AlphaFold Multimer.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Enhancing AlphaFold-Multimer-based Protein Complex Structure Prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating the accuracy of quaternary structural models of protein complexes and assemblies (EMA) is important for predicting quaternary structures and applying them to studying protein function and interaction. The pairwise similarity between structural models is proven useful for estimating the quality of protein tertiary structural models, but it has been rarely applied to predicting the quality of quaternary structural models. Moreover, the pairwise similarity approach often fails when many structural models are of low quality and similar to each other. To address the gap, we developed a hybrid method (MULTICOM_qa) combining a pairwise similarity score (PSS) and an interface contact probability score (ICPS) based on the deep learning inter-chain contact prediction for estimating protein complex model accuracy. It blindly participated in the 15th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15) in 2022 and performed very well in estimating the global structure accuracy of assembly models. The average per-target correlation coefficient between the model quality scores predicted by MULTICOM_qa and the true quality scores of the models of CASP15 assembly targets is 0.66. The average per-target ranking loss in using the predicted quality scores to rank the models is 0.14. It was able to select good models for most targets. Moreover, several key factors (i.e., target difficulty, model sampling difficulty, skewness of model quality, and similarity between good/bad models) for EMA are identified and analyzed. The results demonstrate that combining the multi-model method (PSS) with the complementary single-model method (ICPS) is a promising approach to EMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.