Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357763›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Effects of different processing techniques of palm kernel cake on processing quality of pellet feed, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal microbiota of pigs.

Tongxin Wang, Shimin Li, Jiaxin Ning, Jiaming Li, Yanxu Han, Xinyi Yin, Xinlei Huang, Feiruo Huang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tongxin WangFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Shimin LiFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jiaxin NingFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jiaming LiFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Yanxu HanFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xinyi YinFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xinlei HuangFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.
Feiruo HuangFrontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5404-8091

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M711274Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production 2662023DKPY002Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2022CFB778National Key Research and Development Program 2021YFD1300031National Natural Science Foundation of China 32072742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of extrusion, fermentation, and enzymolysis of palm kernel cake on processing quality of pellet feed, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal microbiota of pigs. First, the pretreatment parameters of extrusion, enzymolysis, and fermentation of palm kernel cake were optimized. Then, PKC after three processing techniques were used to prepare pellet feed. A total of 160 crossbred piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) with an average body weight of 28 ± 0.5 kg were used in an 8-wk feeding experiment. Pigs were randomly assigned to five treatments with four replicates per treatment and eight pigs per replicates. The five experimental groups were as follows: basal diet group (whole corn-soybean meal), 10% PKC group (PKC), 10% extrusion PKC group (PPKC), 10% enzymolysis PKC group (EPKC), and 10% fermented PKC group (FPKC), respectively. At the end of the experiment, four pigs from each treatment (randomly collected one pig per pen) were sacrificed by administering a pentobarbital overdose, the gut and blood samples were collected for the quantification analysis of microbiota, hematological parameters, and apparent total tract nutrient digestibility. The results showed that all three processing techniques significantly decreased the contents of crude fiber of PKC (P < 0.01), pulverization rate (P < 0.01), powder content (P < 0.01), and increased the hardness and gelatinization starch of pellet feed (P < 0.05) compared to PKC group. In addition, PPKC significantly improved the dry matter, crude protein, and ether extract content, blood indices and average daily feed intake compared to PKC group (P < 0.01), while the parameters were similar among FPKC, EPKC, and control group (P > 0.01). Furthermore, all three processing techniques significantly increased the Lactobacillus and decreased the Escherichia levels in feces or gut compared to PKC. Collectively, extrusion, fermentation, and enzymolysis of PKC had positively enhanced the pellet quality, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiota, extrusion exhibited a superior feeding effect compared to fermentation and enzymolysis.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDigestionNutrientsSwineNutrientsdifferent processing techniquesgrowing and finishing pigsintestinal microbiotapalm kernel cakepellet feed

Identifiers

PMID37357763
PMCPMC10362929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.