Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357734›Full record

SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Long-term outcomes of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amir Hassankhani, Sherief Ghozy, Melika Amoukhteh, Cem Bilgin, Ramanathan Kadirvel, David F Kallmes

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative radial force measurements of Woven EndoBridge devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amir HassankhaniDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-5341
Sherief GhozyDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5629-3023
Melika AmoukhtehDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cem BilginDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6243-9495
Ramanathan KadirvelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-9953
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8495-0040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) has been specifically developed to manage wide neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. A wide range of aneurysm occlusion rates and device-related complications are reported in different papers, and a lack of collective evidence in this regard.ObjectiveTo clarify the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of intracranial aneurysm treatment with WEB devices.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases on April 25, 2023. Considering the eligibility criteria, all the studies reporting the outcomes of the intracranial aneurysm treatment with WEB device at 1 and/or more than 1 year were included. Data elements of interest were extracted and analyzed using R software version 4.2.1.ResultsTwenty-seven articles were included. Complete occlusion rate was 56.85%, 67.10%, and 56.34% at one year, beyond one year, and at/beyond two years of follow-up, respectively. Adequate occlusion rate was 87.11% at one year, 91.16% beyond one year, and 88.87% at/beyond two years of follow-up. WEB compression and aneurysm recurrence rates increased from 17.62% and 0.58% at one year to 42.59% and 18.99% beyond one year of follow-up, respectively. An increase in retreatment rate from 3.45% at one year to 7.15% beyond one year of follow-up was found.ConclusionThe current study supports the long-term efficacy of WEB devices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, an increase in WEB compression, aneurysm recurrence, and retreatment rates beyond one year reveals the importance of follow-ups after the first year of WEB placement.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmHumansTreatment OutcomeEndovascular treatmentintracranial aneurysmWEB device

Identifiers

PMID37357734
PMCPMC13294524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.