Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357579›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2023

Decision rules for egg-color-based rejection by two cavity-nesting hosts of the brown-headed cowbird.

Alexander J Di Giovanni, Juliana Villa, Mark T Stanback, Charles F Thompson, Scott K Sakaluk, Mark E Hauber, Daniel Hanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander J Di GiovanniDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Juliana VillaDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Mark T StanbackDepartment of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA.
Charles F ThompsonBehavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Section, School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA.
Scott K SakalukBehavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Section, School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-1438
Mark E HauberDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-4928
Daniel HanleyDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0523-4335

Funding

Induced immunity as a source of maternal effects on offspring phenotypeR15HD076308 · NICHD · ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAKALUK, SCOTT K, THOMPSON, CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$846k
NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD076308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hosts of obligate avian brood parasites often evolve defense mechanisms to avoid rearing unrelated young. One common defense is egg rejection, for which hosts often rely on eggshell color. Most research has assumed that hosts respond to perceived color differences between their own eggs and parasite eggs regardless of the particular color; however, recent experiments have found that many hosts respond more strongly to brown foreign eggs than to equally dissimilar blue eggs. Yet, none of these prior studies tested a brown-egg-laying species and, with only one exception, all were conducted in open nests where light levels are considered sufficient for effective color-based egg discrimination. Here, we explored how two cavity-nesting hosts of the parasitic brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) - the blue-egg-laying eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis) and the brown-egg-laying house wren (Troglodytes aedon) - respond to experimental eggs painted six distinct colors ranging from blue to brown. Rejection responses of both hosts were best predicted by perceived differences in color between the model egg and their own eggs. Specifically, we found that house wrens preferentially rejected eggs bluer than their own eggs. However, although we found that bluebirds relied on perceived differences in color for their egg rejection decisions, further tests are needed to determine whether they preferentially rejected brown eggs or simply responded to absolute perceived differences in color. These findings demonstrate that these cavity-nesting birds treat perceived color differences in distinct ways, which has important implications on the coevolutionary arms races and the interpretation of avian-perceived color differences.

Indexed as

ParasitesPasseriformesSongbirdsAnimalsEggsHost-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorOvumBrood parasitismColor perceptionDecision-makingEgg discriminationRecognition

Identifiers

PMID37357579
PMCPMC10399979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.