Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357412›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

Sample size and power determination for multiparameter evaluation in nonlinear regression models with potential stratification.

Michael J Martens, Soyoung Kim, Kwang Woo Ahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J MartensDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3799-681X
Soyoung KimDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1404-0575
Kwang Woo AhnDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4567-8037

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
PROLACTIN RECEPTOR COMPLEX IN BREAST CANCERR01CA069294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLEVENGER, CHARLES V · 1996 to 2006
$1.9M
HRSA HHS HHSH250201200016CNCI NIH HHS U10HL069294NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U10HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample size and power determination are crucial design considerations for biomedical studies intending to formally test the effects of key variables on an outcome. Other known prognostic factors may exist, necessitating the use of techniques for covariate adjustment when conducting this evaluation. Moreover, the main interest often includes assessing the impact of more than one variable on an outcome, such as multiple treatments or risk factors. Regression models are frequently employed for these purposes, formalizing this assessment as a test of multiple regression parameters. But, the presence of multiple variables of primary interest and correlation between covariates can complicate sample size/power calculation. Given the paucity of available sample size formulas for this context, these calculations are often performed via simulation, which can be both time-consuming as well as demanding extensive probability modeling. We propose a simpler, general approach to sample size and power determination that may be applied when testing multiple parameters in commonly used regression models, including generalized linear models as well as ordinary and stratified versions of the Cox and Fine-Gray models. Through both rigorous simulations and theoretical derivations, we demonstrate the formulas' accuracy in producing sample sizes that will meet the type I error rate and power specifications of the study design.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignComputer SimulationLinear ModelsRisk FactorsSample SizeCox regressionFine-Gray modelgeneralized linear modelssample size/power determinationstratificationstudy design

Identifiers

PMID37357412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.