Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357310›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023

Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shingo Kato, Mai Azuma, Naoki Nakayama, Kazuki Fukui, Masanori Ito, Naka Saito, Nobuyuki Horita, Daisuke Utsunomiya

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automatic vessel segmentation and reformation of non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography using transfer learning-based three-dimensional U-net with attention mechanism.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  9. Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shingo KatoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan. shingo.m12226@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7545-0669
Mai AzumaDepartment of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Naoki NakayamaDepartment of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuki FukuiDepartment of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Masanori ItoDepartment of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Naka SaitoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Nobuyuki HoritaChemotherapy Center, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Daisuke UtsunomiyaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center · JPYokohama City University · JPKanagawa Children's Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively investigate the diagnostic ability of 1.5 T and 3.0 T whole heart coronary angiography (WHCA) to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) on X-ray coronary angiography.

methodsA literature search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane advanced search, and EMBASE, was performed to retrieve and integrate articles showing significant CAD detectability of 1.5 and 3.0 T WHCA.

resultsData from 1899 patients from 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 1.5 T WHCA had a summary area under ROC of 0.88 in the patient-based analysis, 0.90 in the vessel-based analysis, and 0.92 in the segment-based analysis. These values for 3.0 T WHCA were 0.94, 0.95, 0.96, respectively. Contrast-enhanced 3.0 T WHCA had significantly higher specificity than non-contrast-enhanced 1.5 T WHCA on a patient-based analysis (0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.92 vs. 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.82, P = 0.02). There were no differences in diagnostic performance on a patient-based analysis by use of vasodilators, beta-blockers or between Asian and Western countries.

conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of WHCA was deemed satisfactory, with contrast-enhanced 3.0 T WHCA exhibiting higher specificity compared to non-contrast-enhanced 1.5 T WHCA in a patient-based analysis. There were no significant differences in diagnostic performance on a patient-based analysis in terms of vasodilator or beta-blocker use, nor between Asian and Western countries. However, further large-scale multicentre studies are crucial for the widespread global adoption of WHCA.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMagnetic Resonance AngiographyCoronary AngiographyHeartHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityVasodilator AgentsVasodilator AgentsCoronary artery diseaseDiagnostic accuracyMagnetic resonance angiographyMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37357310
PMCPMC10291762
OpenAlexW4381988592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.