Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37356640›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Overview of the 2022 n2c2 shared task on contextualized medication event extraction in clinical notes.

Diwakar Mahajan, Jennifer J Liang, Ching-Huei Tsou, Özlem Uzuner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinical natural language processing for secondary uses.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diwakar MahajanIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer J LiangIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: jjliang@us.ibm.com.
Ching-Huei TsouIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States of America.
Özlem UzunerDepartment of Information Sciences & Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America.

Funding

National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2): Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical NarrativesR13LM013127 · NLM · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2019 to 2023
$100k
NLM NIH HHS R13 LM013127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn accurate medication history, foundational for providing quality medical care, requires understanding of medication change events documented in clinical notes. However, extracting medication changes without the necessary clinical context is insufficient for real-world applications.

methodsTo address this need, Track 1 of the 2022 National NLP Clinical Challenges focused on extracting the context for medication changes documented in clinical notes using the Contextualized Medication Event Dataset. Track 1 consisted of 3 subtasks: extracting medication mentions from clinical notes (NER), determining whether a medication change is being discussed (Event), and determining the action, negation, temporality, certainty, and actor for any change events (Context). Participants were allowed to participate in any one or more of the subtasks.

resultsA total of 32 teams with participants from 19 countries submitted a total of 211 systems across all subtasks. Most teams formulated NER as a token classification task and Event and Context as multi-class classification tasks, using transformer-based large language models. Overall, performance for NER was high across submitted systems. However, performance for Event and Context were much lower, often due to indirectly stated change events with no clear action verb, events requiring farther textual clues for understanding, and medication mentions with multiple change events.

conclusionsThis shared task showed that while NLP research on medication extraction is relatively mature, understanding of contextual information surrounding medication events in clinical notes is still an open problem requiring further research to achieve the end goal of supporting real-world clinical applications.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingHumansLanguageClinical informaticsElectronic health recordsInformation extractionMedication informationNatural language processingShared task

Identifiers

PMID37356640
PMCPMC10529825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.