Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37356076›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia?

Jessica Bucholc, Nikki McCaffrey, Anna Ugalde, Anne Muldowney, Stacey Rand, Renske Hoefman, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Lidia Engel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica BucholcDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. j.bucholc@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-2704
Nikki McCaffreyDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-3723
Anna UgaldeQuality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-8435
Anne MuldowneyOlder Persons Advocacy Network, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4379-5224
Stacey RandPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-2842
Renske HoefmanThe Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-2562
Cathrine MihalopoulosHealth Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9462
Lidia EngelHealth Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-3149

Funding

Deakin University Faculty of Health Research Capacity Building Gran
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentify aspects of quality of life (QoL) important to Australian informal carers and explore how well the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Care-related Quality of Life instrument and Carer Experience Scale capture these aspects in the Australian context.

methodsOnline questionnaires were completed by Australian informal carers. Socio-demographics, open-ended questions: positive/negative aspects of caring and QoL aspects missing from the instruments, and ranking of the instrument domains was used to explore the content of the instruments. Instruments were scored using preference-weighted value sets (reported in another paper). Content analysis was used to analyse the open-ended responses. Chi-squared test looked at differences in domain importance. Descriptive analyses summarised all other information.

resultsEight themes were identified: Behaviour-mood of the care recipient, Caring responsibilities, Finances, Health, Own life, Perception of carers, Relationship with care recipient and Support. Many aspects of carer QoL mentioned as missing in the instruments appeared covered by the domains, of which all were reported as important. The highest ranked domain was relationship with the care recipient. The influence of the care recipient specific support, behaviour/mood and health on carer QoL appear absent in all instruments.

conclusionThe content of the three instruments appears relevant in an Australian setting. The influence of care recipient's health and well-being on carer QoL should be considered, along with spillover effects. A content and/or face validity analysis is required to confirm differences in item interpretation in Australian informal carers.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality of LifeAdultAustraliaHumansSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesCarer-related quality of lifeInformal careOutcome measurementPreference-based measures

Identifiers

PMID37356076
PMCPMC10522516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.