Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355696›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Combined electric and magnetic field therapy for bone repair and regeneration: an investigation in a 3-mm and an augmented 17-mm tibia osteotomy model in sheep.

Salim E Darwiche, Anna Kaczmarek, Peter Schwarzenberg, Brendan J Inglis, Beat Lechmann, Peter Kronen, Stephen J Ferguson, Hannah Dailey, Brigitte von Rechenberg, Karina Klein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Salim E DarwicheMusculoskeletal Research Unit (MSRU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland. sdarwiche@vetclinics.uzh.ch.
Anna KaczmarekMusculoskeletal Research Unit (MSRU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
Peter SchwarzenbergLehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Brendan J InglisLehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Beat LechmannJohnson & Johnson Family of Companies, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Peter KronenMusculoskeletal Research Unit (MSRU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephen J FergusonCenter for Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine (CABMM), University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hannah DaileyLehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Brigitte von RechenbergMusculoskeletal Research Unit (MSRU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
Karina KleinMusculoskeletal Research Unit (MSRU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHLehigh University · USInstitute for Biomedical Engineering · CHJohnson & Johnson (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapies using electromagnetic field technology show evidence of enhanced bone regeneration at the fracture site, potentially preventing delayed or nonunions.

methodsCombined electric and magnetic field (CEMF) treatment was evaluated in two standardized sheep tibia osteotomy models: a 3-mm non-critical size gap model and a 17-mm critical size defect model augmented with autologous bone grafts, both stabilized with locking compression plates. CEMF treatment was delivered across the fracture gap twice daily for 90 min, starting 4 days postoperatively (post-OP) until sacrifice (9 or 12 weeks post-OP, respectively). Control groups received no CEMF treatment. Bone healing was evaluated radiographically, morphometrically (micro-CT), biomechanically and histologically.

resultsIn the 3-mm gap model, the CEMF group (n = 6) exhibited higher callus mineral density compared to the Control group (n = 6), two-fold higher biomechanical torsional rigidity and a histologically more advanced callus maturity (no statistically significant differences). In the 17-mm graft model, differences between the Control (n = 6) and CEMF group (n = 6) were more pronounced. The CEMF group showed a radiologically more advanced callus, a higher callus volume (p = 0.003) and a 2.6 × higher biomechanical torsional rigidity (p = 0.024), combined with a histologically more advanced callus maturity and healing.

conclusionsThis study showed that CEMF therapy notably enhanced bone healing resulting in better new bone structure, callus morphology and superior biomechanical properties. This technology could transform a standard inert orthopedic implant into an active device stimulating bone tissue for accelerated healing and regeneration.

Indexed as

Magnetic Field TherapyTibial FracturesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBony CallusFracture HealingOsteotomySheepTibiaBoneElectromagnetic field therapyFracture healingOvine models

Identifiers

PMID37355696
PMCPMC10290367
OpenAlexW4381856372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.