Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355684›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Offshore freshened groundwater in the Pearl River estuary and shelf as a significant water resource.

Chong Sheng, Jiu Jimmy Jiao, Xin Luo, Jinchao Zuo, Lei Jia, Jinghe Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chong ShengDepartment of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-8311
Jiu Jimmy JiaoDepartment of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. jjiao@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7180-6488
Xin LuoDepartment of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-2765
Jinchao ZuoThe University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Institution of Research and Innovation (SIRI), Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-814X
Lei JiaGuangzhou Marine Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-7583
Jinghe CaoKey Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-0660

Funding

National Science Foundation of China | Key Programme 42130702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-river deltaic estuaries and adjacent continental shelves have experienced multiple phases of transgressions and regressions to form interlayered aquifer-aquitard systems and are expected to host vast paleo-terrestrial groundwater hundreds of kilometres offshore. Here, we used offshore hydrogeology, marine geophysical reflections, porewater geochemistry, and paleo-hydrogeological models, and identified a previously unknown offshore freshened groundwater body with a static volume up to 575.6 ± 44.9 km

Indexed as

GroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalChinaEnvironmental MonitoringEstuariesFresh WaterPovidoneRiversWater ResourcesPovidoneWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID37355684
PMCPMC10290674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.