Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355643›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Differentially private knowledge transfer for federated learning.

Tao Qi, Fangzhao Wu, Chuhan Wu, Liang He, Yongfeng Huang, Xing Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Making the case for an International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao QiDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-3217
Fangzhao WuMicrosoft Research Asia, 100080, Beijing, China. fangzwu@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-1272
Chuhan WuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China. wuchuhan15@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-8792
Liang HeDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China.
Yongfeng HuangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China. yfhuang@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-2230
Xing XieMicrosoft Research Asia, 100080, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8608-8482

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82090053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting useful knowledge from big data is important for machine learning. When data is privacy-sensitive and cannot be directly collected, federated learning is a promising option that extracts knowledge from decentralized data by learning and exchanging model parameters, rather than raw data. However, model parameters may encode not only non-private knowledge but also private information of local data, thereby transferring knowledge via model parameters is not privacy-secure. Here, we present a knowledge transfer method named PrivateKT, which uses actively selected small public data to transfer high-quality knowledge in federated learning with privacy guarantees. We verify PrivateKT on three different datasets, and results show that PrivateKT can maximally reduce 84% of the performance gap between centralized learning and existing federated learning methods under strict differential privacy restrictions. PrivateKT provides a potential direction to effective and privacy-preserving knowledge transfer in machine intelligent systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataKnowledgeMachine LearningPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID37355643
PMCPMC10290720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.