Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355621›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2023

Intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II trial.

Guozhen Yang, Xiaodong Su, Yuanheng Huang, Guangyu Luo, Zhiqiang Wang, Peiqiang Cai, Yating Zheng, Ting Bei, Mengli Huang, Yuezong Bai and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  8. CCL5Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Guozhen Yang *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodong Su *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanheng Huang *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Guangyu Luo *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqiang WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Peiqiang CaiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yating ZhengMedical Affairs, 3D Medicines, Inc, Shanghai, China.
Ting BeiMedical Affairs, 3D Medicines, Inc, Shanghai, China.
Mengli HuangMedical Affairs, 3D Medicines, Inc, Shanghai, China.
Yuezong BaiMedical Affairs, 3D Medicines, Inc, Shanghai, China.
Haoqiang HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jin XiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Muyan CaiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiudi ZhongDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qiyu GuoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. zhangxu@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-8029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicity in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 25% of patients relapsed within 1 year after surgery, indicating that a short course of treatment may not be sufficient. Therefore, exploring the effects of intensive treatment is needed for optimal clinical outcomes.

methodsLocally advanced ESCC patients were administered three cycles of camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine, followed by thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility, radiologic response, survival outcomes, and immunologic/genomic correlates of efficacy.

resultsForty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two patients received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The complete and major pathological response rates were 33.3% and 64.3%, respectively, and the objective response rate was 80.0%. Three cycles of treatment significantly improved T down-staging compared to two cycles (P = 0.03). The most common treatment-related adverse events were grades 1-2, and no surgical delay was reported. With a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the 1-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were both 97.6%, and the 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 92.3% and 97.6%, respectively. Three patients experienced disease recurrence or metastasis ranging from 12.5 to 25.8 months after surgery, and one patient died 6 months after surgery due to cardiovascular disease. Neither programmed death-ligand 1 expression nor tumor mutational burden was associated with pathological response. An increased infiltration of CD56

conclusionsIt seems probable that intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine increased tumor regression and improved survival outcomes. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029807, Registered February 14, 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=49459 .

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCapecitabineHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedcamrelizumabCapecitabineChemotherapyESCCImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID37355621
PMCPMC10290378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.