ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation and validation of a simplified Chinese version of the psychosocial assessment tool.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42(CPCI-42) is mainly used for chronic pain management project, its original version is written in English and has been widely used in western countries. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to apply the CPCI-42 to Chinese patients and evaluate its responsiveness, reliability, and validity for Chinese patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
methodsTranslation and adaptation were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Outcome Committee. A total of 133 patients who were diagnosed with LDH were included in this study. Psychometric evaluations were then performed and included score distribution, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness.
resultsCPCI-42 is well adapted to the assessment of the cognitive and behavioral strategies of patients with LDH, and the scores of score distribution, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness are excellent. Forward and reverse translation of the CPCI-42 to English from Chinese worked smoothly.
conclusionIt is applicable to the assessment of quality of life of the cognitive and behavioral strategies of patients with LDH, and the scores of all indicators are excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.