Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355610›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

Beliefs, attitudes and experiences of virtual overdose monitoring services from the perspectives of people who use substances in Canada: a qualitative study.

Tyler Marshall, Dylan Viste, Stephanie Jones, Julia Kim, Amanda Lee, Farah Jafri, Oona Krieg, S Monty Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using illicit drugs alone in Vancouver, Canada: a gender-based analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tyler MarshallDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-3639
Dylan VisteDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-2682
Stephanie JonesThree Hive Consulting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julia KimDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Amanda LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Farah JafriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Oona KriegBRAVE CO-OP, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
S Monty GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. ghosh@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1566-0015

Funding

CIHR CIHR FRN:181006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolitary use of substances is a risk factor for substance use-related mortality. Novel e-health harm reduction interventions such as virtual overdose monitoring services (VOMS) have emerged in North America to improve access to emergency overdose support for people who use substances (PWUS). To date, little research has been published, and the perspectives of PWUS are needed to inform evaluation and policy efforts.

objectiveTo explore the beliefs, values and perceptions of PWUS around using and accessing VOMS in Canada.

methodsA qualitative study following grounded theory methodology was conducted. Using existing peer networks, purposive and snowball sampling was conducted to recruit PWUS (≥ 18 years) with previous experience with VOMS. Thematic analysis was used to analyze twenty-three interviews. Several methods were employed to enhance rigor, such as independent data coding and triangulation.

resultsTwenty-three one-on-one telephone interviews of PWUS with previous experience with VOMS were completed and analyzed. The following themes emerged: (1) feelings of optimism around VOMS to save lives; (2) privacy/confidentiality was highly valued due to stigma and fear of arrest; (3) concerns with reliable cell phones negatively impacting VOMS uptake; (4) concerns around emergency response times, specifically in rural/remote communities; (5) desire for trusting relationships with VOMS operators; (6) importance of mental health supports and referrals to psychosocial services; and (7) possible limited uptake due to low public awareness of VOMS.

conclusionThis qualitative study provided novel insights about the VOMS from the perspectives of PWUS. PWUS generally felt optimistic about the potential of VOMS as a suitable harm reduction intervention, but several potential barriers around accessing VOMS were identified that may limit uptake. Future research is warranted.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseSubstance-Related DisordersAttitudeCanadaHumansQualitative ResearchAddictionsCanadaE-healthHarm reductionPeople who use substancesVirtual overdose monitoring services

Identifiers

PMID37355610
PMCPMC10290798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.