Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355435›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024

Deep learning-based affine medical image registration for multimodal minimal-invasive image-guided interventions - A comparative study on generalizability.

Anika Strittmatter, Lothar R Schad, Frank G Zöllner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in medical physics.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024
    Article
  6. Age Encoded Adversarial Learning for Pediatric CT Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anika StrittmatterComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: Anika.Strittmatter@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Lothar R SchadComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Frank G ZöllnerComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal image registration is applied in medical image analysis as it allows the integration of complementary data from multiple imaging modalities. In recent years, various neural network-based approaches for medical image registration have been presented in papers, but due to the use of different datasets, a fair comparison is not possible. In this research 20 different neural networks for an affine registration of medical images were implemented. The networks' performance and the networks' generalizability to new datasets were evaluated using two multimodal datasets - a synthetic and a real patient dataset - of three-dimensional CT and MR images of the liver. The networks were first trained semi-supervised using the synthetic dataset and then evaluated on the synthetic dataset and the unseen patient dataset. Afterwards, the networks were finetuned on the patient dataset and subsequently evaluated on the patient dataset. The networks were compared using our own developed CNN as benchmark and a conventional affine registration with SimpleElastix as baseline. Six networks improved the pre-registration Dice coefficient of the synthetic dataset significantly (p-value < 0.05) and nine networks improved the pre-registration Dice coefficient of the patient dataset significantly and are therefore able to generalize to the new datasets used in our experiments. Many different machine learning-based methods have been proposed for affine multimodal medical image registration, but few are generalizable to new data and applications. It is therefore necessary to conduct further research in order to develop medical image registration techniques that can be applied more widely.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLiverNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedAffineDeep learningMedical imagesMultimodal dataNeural networksRegistration

Identifiers

PMID37355435
PMCPMC11156775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.