Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355268›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Lung cancer survivors' views on telerehabilitation following curative intent therapy: a formative qualitative study.

Duc M Ha, Mary A Nunnery, Robert P Klocko, Leah M Haverhals, David B Bekelman, Melissa L New, Simran K Randhawa, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley, Jamie L Studts, Allan V Prochazka and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05179408 (Telerehabilitation for Veteran Lung Cancer Survivors Following Curative Intent Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05179408 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Telerehabilitation for Veteran Lung Cancer Survivors Following Curative Intent Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsLung Cancer, Cancer SurvivorsArmsTargeted-telerehabilitation, Waitlist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Survivorship Challenges and Supportive Care in Lung Cancer.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. A qualitative study of the discharge planning needs of lung cancer patients and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Empowering Recovery: A Co-Designed Intervention to Transform Care for Operable Lung Cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Duc M HaSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA duc.ha@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3003-9438
Mary A NunneryDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care, Research Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Robert P KlockoDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care, Research Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Leah M HaverhalsDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care, Research Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8155-5491
David B BekelmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Melissa L NewSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Simran K RandhawaSurgical Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jennifer E Stevens-LapsleyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jamie L StudtsDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Allan V ProchazkaDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Robert L KeithSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Denver VA Medical Center · USVeterans Health Administration · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

Telerehabilitation for Veteran Lung Cancer Survivors Following Curative Intent TherapyIK2RX003661 · VA · VA EASTERN COLORADO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI Duc M. Ha · 2022 to 2026
–
RRD VA IK2 RX003661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo inform personalised home-based rehabilitation interventions, we sought to gain in-depth understanding of lung cancer survivors' (1) attitudes and perceived self-efficacy towards telemedicine; (2) knowledge of the benefits of rehabilitation and exercise training; (3) perceived facilitators and preferences for telerehabilitation; and (4) health goals following curative intent therapy.

designWe conducted semi-structured interviews guided by Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and used directed content analysis to identify salient themes.

settingOne USA Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

participantsWe enrolled 20 stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors who completed curative intent therapy in the prior 1-6 months. Eighty-five percent of participants had prior experience with telemedicine, but none with telerehabilitation or rehabilitation for lung cancer.

resultsParticipants viewed telemedicine as convenient, however impersonal and technologically challenging, with most reporting low self-efficacy in their ability to use technology. Most reported little to no knowledge of the potential benefits of specific exercise training regimens, including those directed towards reducing dyspnoea, fatigue or falls. If they were to design their own telerehabilitation programme, participants had a predominant preference for live and one-on-one interaction with a therapist, to enhance therapeutic relationship and ensure correct learning of the training techniques. Most participants had trouble stating their explicit health goals, with many having questions or concerns about their lung cancer status. Some wanted better control of symptoms and functional challenges or engage in healthful behaviours.

conclusionsFeatures of telerehabilitation interventions for lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy may need to include strategies to improve self-efficacy and skills with telemedicine. Education to improve knowledge of the benefits of rehabilitation and exercise training, with alignment to patient-formulated goals, may increase uptake. Exercise training with live and one-on-one therapist interaction may enhance learning, adherence, and completion. Future work should determine how to incorporate these features into telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsLung NeoplasmsTelemedicineTelerehabilitationHumansLungQUALITATIVE RESEARCHREHABILITATION MEDICINETelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37355268
PMCPMC10314696
OpenAlexW4381884093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.