Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37355048›Full record

ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2023

Is outpatient spine surgery associated with new, persistent opioid use in opioid-naïve patients? A retrospective national claims database analysis.

Emily Schultz, Thompson Zhuang, Lauren M Shapiro, Serena S Hu, Robin N Kamal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily SchultzVOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University.
Thompson ZhuangVOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University.
Lauren M ShapiroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco.
Serena S HuVOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University.
Robin N KamalVOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University. Electronic address: rnkamal@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Developing and Testing a Tool for Preference Elicitation in Carpal Tunnel SyndromeK23AR073307 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KAMAL, ROBIN N · 2018 to 2022
$866k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR073307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextAlthough spine procedures have historically been performed inpatient, there has been a recent shift to the outpatient setting for selected cases due to increased patient satisfaction and reduced cost. Effective postoperative pain management while limiting over-prescribing of opioids, which may lead to persistent opioid use, is critical to performing spine surgery in the outpatient setting. PURPOSE: To assess if there is an increased risk for new, persistent opioid use between inpatient and outpatient spine procedures. STUDY

designRetrospective analysis using national administrative claims database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 390,049 opioid-naïve patients with a perioperative opioid prescription who underwent an inpatient or outpatient spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients with perioperative opioid prescriptions who filled ≥ 1 opioid prescription between 90- and 180-days following surgery were defined as new, persistent opioid users.

methodsWe utilized a claims database to identify opioid-naïve patients who underwent lumbar or cervical fusion, total disc arthroplasty, or decompression procedures. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between inpatient versus outpatient surgery and the development of new, persistent opioid use while adjusting for several patient factors.

resultsA total of 19,205 (11.7%) inpatient and 18,546 (8.2%) outpatient patients developed new, persistent opioid use. Outpatient lumbar and cervical spine surgery patients were significantly less likely to develop new, persistent opioid use following surgery compared to inpatient spine surgery patients (OR = 0.71 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.69, 0.73], p < .001). Average morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (inpatient = 1,476 MME +/- 22.7, outpatient = 1,072 MME +/- 18.5, p < .001) and average MMEs per day (inpatient = 91.6 MME +/- 0.32, outpatient = 77.7 MME +/- 0.28, p < .001) were lower in the outpatient cohort compared to the inpatient.

conclusionOur results support the shift from inpatient to outpatient spine procedures, as outpatient procedures were not associated with an increased risk for new, persistent opioid use. As more patients become candidates for outpatient spine surgery, predictors of new, persistent opioid use should be considered during risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic Study. MINI ABSTRACT: We utilized a national administrative claims database to identify opioid-naïve patients who underwent common spine procedures. Outpatient lumbar and cervical spine surgery patients were significantly less likely to be new, persistent opioid users following surgery compared to inpatient spine surgery patients. Our results support the shift to outpatient spine procedures.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresEndrinHumansOutpatientsPostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidEndrinMMECervicalLumbarOpioidsOutpatient surgeryPersistent opioid useSpine

Identifiers

PMID37355048
PMCPMC10538426
OpenAlexW4381620814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.