Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354562›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2023

Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-Daily Insulin Degludec in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The ONWARDS 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ildiko Lingvay, Marisse Asong, Cyrus Desouza, Pierre Gourdy, Soumitra Kar, André Vianna, Tina Vilsbøll, Siri Vinther, Yiming Mu

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04795531 phase3completednot on this map

A 26-week Double Blinded, Multiregional, Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec and Once Daily Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL, Both in Combination With Non-insulin Anti-diabetic Drugs, in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2021 to 2022Enrolled588ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin icodec, Placebo insulin icodec, Insulin degludec, Placebo insulin degludec
NCT07747402 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Different Insulin Icodec Initiation Strategies and a Day-4 Supplemental Dosing Decision on Early Fasting Blood Glucose Target Attainment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, 3x2 Factorial Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXi'an International Medical Center HospitalRan2027 to 2028Enrolled462ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsInsulin icodec
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Ildiko LingvayDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine and Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Marisse AsongNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Cyrus DesouzaUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Pierre GourdyCHU de Toulouse & UMR1297/I2MC, Inserm, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
Soumitra KarNovo Nordisk Service Centre India Private Ltd, Bangalore, India.
André ViannaCuritiba Diabetes Centre, Department of Endocrine Diseases, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil.
Tina VilsbøllClinical Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Siri VintherNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Yiming MuDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKChinese People's Liberation Army · CNHospital Nossa Senhora das Graças · BRInserm · FRNovo Nordisk (India) · INSteno Diabetes Centers · DKThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Once-weekly insulin icodec could provide a simpler dosing alternative to daily basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec vs once-daily insulin degludec in people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 at 92 sites in 11 countries in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with any noninsulin glucose-lowering agents with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7%-11% (53-97 mmol/mol). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either once-weekly icodec and once-daily placebo (icodec group; n = 294) or once-daily degludec and once-weekly placebo (degludec group; n = 294). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.3% percentage points). Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 26, mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, body weight change from baseline to week 26, and number of level 2 (clinically significant; glucose level <54 mg/dL) and level 3 (severe; requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycemic episodes. Results: Among 588 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [10] years; 219 [37%] women), 564 (96%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.6% (observed) to 7.0% (estimated) at 26 weeks in the icodec group and from 8.5% (observed) to 7.2% (estimated) in the degludec group (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.2 [95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1] percentage points), confirming noninferiority (P < .001) and superiority (P = .002). There were no significant differences between the icodec and degludec groups for fasting plasma glucose change from baseline to week 26 (ETD, 0 [95% CI, -6 to 5] mg/dL; P = .90), mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, or body weight change from baseline to week 26 (2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg; ETD, 0.46 [95% CI, -0.19 to 1.10] kg; P = .17). Combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates were numerically higher in the icodec group than the degludec group from week 0 to 31 (0.31 vs 0.15 events per patient-year exposure; P = .11) and statistically higher in the icodec group from week 0 to 26 (0.35 vs 0.12 events per patient-year exposure; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes, once-weekly icodec demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction to once-daily degludec after 26 weeks of treatment, with no difference in weight change and a higher rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events in the context of less than 1 event per patient-year exposure in both groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04795531.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Long-ActingAgedBlood GlucoseBody WeightDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecinsulin icodecInsulin, Long-Acting

Identifiers

PMID37354562
PMCPMC10354685
OpenAlexW4381887577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.