Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354496›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

S-leaping: an efficient downsampling method for large high-throughput sequencing data.

Hiroyuki Kuwahara, Xin Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiroyuki KuwaharaComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division (CEMSE), Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-6729
Xin GaoComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division (CEMSE), Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-3574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSequencing coverage is among key determinants considered in the design of omics studies. To help estimate cost-effective sequencing coverage for specific downstream analysis, downsampling, a technique to sample subsets of reads with a specific size, is routinely used. However, as the size of sequencing becomes larger and larger, downsampling becomes computationally challenging.

resultsHere, we developed an approximate downsampling method called s-leaping that was designed to efficiently and accurately process large-size data. We compared the performance of s-leaping with state-of-the-art downsampling methods in a range of practical omics-study downsampling settings and found s-leaping to be up to 39% faster than the second-fastest method, with comparable accuracy to the exact downsampling methods. To apply s-leaping on FASTQ data, we developed a light-weight tool called fadso in C. Using whole-genome sequencing data with 208 million reads, we compared fadso's performance with that of a commonly used FASTQ tool with the same downsampling feature and found fadso to be up to 12% faster with 21% lower memory usage, suggesting fadso to have up to 40% higher throughput in a parallel computing setting. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The C source code for s-leaping, as well as the fadso package is freely available at https://github.com/hkuwahara/sleaping.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37354496
PMCPMC10318387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.