Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354389›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2023

Direct withdrawal of a retained foreign body bisecting the thoracic spinal canal in a neurologically intact pediatric patient: illustrative case.

David R Peters, Trent VanHorn, Brandon Karimian, Benjamin Pruden, Scott D Wait, Roy T Daniel, Constantin Tuleasca

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David R Peters1Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Trent VanHornDepartments of3Neurosurgery, and.
Brandon Karimian2Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Benjamin Pruden4Anesthesiology, Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; and.
Scott D Wait2Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Roy T Daniel1Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Constantin Tuleasca1Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHCarolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates · USCarolinas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonmissile penetrating spinal cord injury (NMPSCI) with a retained foreign body (RFB) is rare and usually results in permanent neurological deficits. In extremely rare cases, patients can present without significant neurological deficits despite an RFB that traverses the spinal canal. Given the rarity of these cases, a consensus has not yet been reached on optimal management. In a patient with an RFB and a neurologically normal clinical examination, the risk of open surgical exploration may outweigh the benefit and direct withdrawal may be a better option. OBSERVATIONS: A 10-year-old female suffered an NMPSCI to the thoracic spine with an RFB that bisected the spinal canal but remained neurologically intact. Direct withdrawal of the RFB was chosen instead of open surgical exploration, leading to an excellent clinical outcome. The literature was reviewed to find other examples of thoracic NMPSCI with RFB and neurologically normal examinations. Management strategies were compared. LESSONS: For NMPSCI with RFB and without significant neurological deficits, direct withdrawal is a viable and possibly the best treatment option. The use of fast-acting anesthesia without intubation minimizes patient manipulation, speeds up recovery, and allows early assessment of neurological status after removal.

Indexed as

direct withdrawalpenetrating spinal cord injurypenetrating traumaretained foreign bodyspinal stab wound

Identifiers

PMID37354389
PMCPMC10550528
OpenAlexW4381943742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.