Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354327›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Patient reported experiences of Swedish patients being investigated for cancer during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Helena Tufvesson Stiller, Marcus Schmitt-Egenolf, Helena Fohlin, Srinivas Uppugunduri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Impact of assigned care providers on involvement, information, and emotional support to cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helena Tufvesson StillerDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Helena.Tufvesson.Stiller@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-9555
Marcus Schmitt-EgenolfDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-8474
Helena FohlinRegional Cancer Center Southeast, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-0949
Srinivas UppugunduriRegional Cancer Center Southeast, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-5580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient reported experiences in individuals being investigated for cancer have been recorded in a nationwide survey in Sweden, providing an opportunity to assess the impact of the Covid-19-pandemic. MATERIAL AND

methodsQuestionnaires from 45920 patients were analyzed to assess the experience of being investigated for cancer. Data from before the Covid-19-pandemic (2018-2019) was compared to data acquired during the pandemic (2020-2021), using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Both, patients who were cleared from suspicion of cancer and those who were diagnosed with cancer were included.

resultsFewer patients in total visited health services during the pandemic. However, patients that did seek help did so to a similar extent during as prior to the pandemic. Patient waiting time was perceived to be shorter during the pandemic and judged as neither too long nor too short by most patients. The emotional support to patients improved during the pandemic, whereas the support to next of kin declined. A majority of patients received the results from the investigation in a meeting with the physician. Although there was a preference for receiving results in a meeting with the physician, the pandemic has brought an increasing interest in receiving results by phone.

conclusionSwedish cancer healthcare has shown resilience during the Covid-19-pandemic, maintaining high patient satisfaction while working under conditions of extraordinary pressure. Patients became more open to alternatives to physical "in person" health care visits which could lead to more digital visits in the future. However, support to significant others demands special attention.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsHumansPandemicsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSwedenCancerCovid-19Emotional supportOncologyPatient reported experience measuresPatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37354327
PMCPMC10290588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.