Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354242›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024

Irish general practitioner (GP) perspectives on impact of direct access radiology on patient care in the community: results from a mixed-methods study.

Michael Edmund O'Callaghan, Ronan Fawsitt, Jiaran Gao, John Broughan, Geoff McCombe, Amy Phelan, Diarmuid Quinlan, Claire Collins, Fintan Stanley, Walter Cullen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Edmund O'CallaghanIrish College of General Practitioners (ICGP), Dublin, Ireland. mike.ocallaghan@icgp.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-186X
Ronan FawsittIreland East Hospital Group (IEHG) GP Research Network, University College Dublin/Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Jiaran GaoSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
John BroughanSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Geoff McCombeSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Amy PhelanSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Diarmuid QuinlanIrish College of General Practitioners (ICGP), Dublin, Ireland.
Claire CollinsIrish College of General Practitioners (ICGP), Dublin, Ireland.
Fintan StanleyIrish College of General Practitioners (ICGP), Dublin, Ireland.
Walter CullenIreland East Hospital Group (IEHG) GP Research Network, University College Dublin/Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

Health Service Executive the GPs involved did not receive any additional funds to participate in this project specifically.Health Service Executive The HSE-funded Ireland East Hospital Group have provided financial support to set up a GP research network via UCD School of MedicineHealth Service Executive which was used in this project. The authors of this article did not receive any funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince winter 2020/21, general practitioners (GPs) in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) have been granted access to diagnostic imaging studies on a new publicly funded pathway, expediting access to services previously obtained via hospital-based doctors.

aimsOutline GP perspectives on imaging studies obtained via the new "GP Access to Community Diagnostics" initiative.

methodsA mixed-methods design was employed. Referrals over the first six months of 2019 and 2021 were collated by a private imaging provider, and a randomly selected subset of 2021 studies (maximum 30 referrals per GP) was returned to participating GPs to provide detail on the impact on each patient's care. In-depth qualitative interviews were also conducted with participating GPs.

resultsEleven GPs supplied detailed information on 81 studies organized through the new initiative. GPs reported that the initiative had led to a large proportion of cases being managed solely in general practice, with an 81% reduction in referrals to acute hospital settings and a 58% reduction in referrals to secondary care clinics. GPs felt imaging studies improved patient care in 86% of cases and increased GP workload in 58% of cases. GP qualitative interviews revealed four key themes: improved patient care, increased GP workload, reduction in hospital referrals, and opinions on ongoing management of such initiatives, including guidelines.

conclusionsGPs felt enhancing access to diagnostics improved patient care by expediting diagnosis, decision-making, and treatment and by reducing hospital referrals. GPs were generally positive about the initiative and made some suggestions on future management of the initiative.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersRadiologyHumansPatient CareReferral and ConsultationDiagnostic imagingGeneral practiceHospital avoidancePrimary careRadiologyReferral

Identifiers

PMID37354242
PMCPMC10808218
OpenAlexW4381943738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.