Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37354229›Full record

SynthesisTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2023

Meta-analysis of seed weight QTLome using a consensus and highly dense genetic map in Brassica napus L.

Sayedehsaba Bilgrami, Hadi Darzi Ramandi, Sara Farokhzadeh, Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin, Ahmad Sobhani Najafabadi, Mostafa Ghaderian, Pu Huang, Liezhao Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sayedehsaba BilgramiCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Hadi Darzi RamandiDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-3590
Sara FarokhzadehDepartment of Plant Production, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran.
Mathieu Rousseau-GueutinIGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, University of Rennes, 35650, Le Rheu, France.
Ahmad Sobhani NajafabadiDepartment of Biotechnology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran - Isfahan Branch, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Isfahan, Iran.
Mostafa GhaderianDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45220, USA.
Pu HuangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Liezhao LiuCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, China. liezhao@swu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-6121
Southwest University · CNAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRBu-Ali Sina University · IRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRShiraz University · IRUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 32001509).National Key Research and Development Program of China Development Program of China (2022YFD1200400)National Key Research and Development Program of China National Key ResearchNational Key Research and Development Program of China the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe report here the discovery of high-confidence MQTL regions and of putative candidate genes associated with seed weight in B. napus using a highly dense consensus genetic map and by comparing various large-scale multiomics datasets. Seed weight (SW) is a direct determinant of seed yield in Brassica napus and is controlled by many loci. To unravel the main genomic regions associated with this complex trait, we used 13 available genetic maps to construct a consensus and highly dense map, comprising 40,401 polymorphic markers and 9191 genetic bins, harboring a cumulative length of 3047.8 cM. Then, we performed a meta-analysis using 639 projected SW quantitative trait loci (QTLs) obtained from studies conducted since 1999, enabling the identification of 57 meta-QTLS (MQTLs). The confidence intervals of our MQTLs were 9.8 and 4.3 times lower than the average CIs of the original QTLs for the A and C subgenomes, respectively, resulting in the detection of some key genes and several putative novel candidate genes associated with SW. By comparing the genes identified in MQTL intervals with multiomics datasets and coexpression analyses of common genes, we defined a more reliable and shorter list of putative candidate genes potentially involved in the regulation of seed maturation and SW. As an example, we provide a list of promising genes with high expression levels in seeds and embryos (e.g., BnaA03g04230D, BnaC03g08840D, BnaA10g29580D and BnaA03g27410D) that can be more finely studied through functional genetics experiments or that may be useful for MQTL-assisted breeding for SW. The high-density genetic consensus map and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) physical map generated from the latest B. napus cv. Darmor-bzh v10 assembly will be a valuable resource for further mapping and map-based cloning of other important traits.

Indexed as

Brassica napusChromosome MappingConsensus SequencePlant BreedingSeeds

Identifiers

PMID37354229
OpenAlexW4381855557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.